Things I’ve Noticed About Patriarchy and its Sicknesses

-Women are called “sensitive” by men because men don’t want to admit their horrific behavior towards women causes women to be unhappy.

-Many men want to liberate women for the same reason monkeys want to liberate bananas from trees.  

– Racism suddenly becomes unfashionable when men find out they can bond with men of other races to the detriment of women. 

-The “right” to have sex means an underclass of people is obligated to provide it. 

-If prostitution is liberating, why aren’t half of prostitutes men? You get money for having sex. Men are supposed to like sex and they’re supposed to like money. Come on, guys! Deal breaker!

-Men trade their humanity for acceptance into the boys’ club. If turned away, they demand-still soulless and soiled with the mud they chose to roll in- that women let them back into the Eden they cast themselves out of. When women shut the door, they are called the Devil and Eden Hell. 

-Marriage and pregnancy are the ball and chain patriarchy uses to keep women imprisoned. Men are drafted to act as the jailers. Men who refuse are traitors. 

-The unwillingness to subjugate women gets a man kicked out of the boys’ club. This includes unwillingness to lie to women about men and men’s abilities, especially their genitals and their genitals’ abilities.

-The Rock and Roll movement, especially the late 60s and early 70s genres, promoted bestial sexuality, dark and esoteric occultism, and lack of structure, responsibility, and safety in favor of Dionysian “values,” which overwhelmingly benefit rapists and not women.

-Why are a surprising amount of gay men misogynistic? It’s obvious. Gay men are still men. It’s patriarchy, not hetero-archy.

-Many men don’t really like PIV- or any type of sex, for that matter. They like the feeling of phallically conquering something, perhaps including, as secondary benefit, exotic physical sensations to flavor the process.

-Emmett Till was the black victim of a ghastly beating and unjust murder which were undertaken against him because he whistled in a sexual manner at a white woman…but has anyone stopped to think why it took the murder of a sexual harasser to stir white men’s anger?

-At least men used to be cultured. Then women gained access to literature, philosophy, and the arts, and men suddenly didn’t want to play with those anymore. 

-The male dominated libertarian revolutions care about freedom all right: the freedom to do whatever they want…which coincidentally happens to be problematic and oppressive toward women, black people, gays, Native Americans, etc.

-Do men ever get pressured to go to the doctor’s for erection check ups, or ejaculation control, or napkins for semen “protection”? Why aren’t men hounded to visit an andrologist from age 16 on? Is it, perchance, that the penis is considered perfect?

-The lesbian and gay movements have a vastly different underlying motive. Lesbians are fighting to end social oppression and intolerance; the gay movement is fighting a cock block. 

-The great catch-22: Are masculized men homoerotic because they love men or because they hate women?

-In the French Revolution the theme was “Liberty, equality, and fraternity,” and the word fraternity is very heavily one of male bonding. Liberty for men from feminine like responsibilities and ties, equality (to predicate bonding) among all males, and fraternity meaning loyalty to men of all creeds and classes and to the cause of above said virtues, which included smashing anything “feminine” that (oppressive or not) at least promoted responsibility and sociality. 

-Male dominated societies always call menstrual blood “dirty”. But notice their attitude towards other bodily fluids- diarrhea, vomit, semen, spit, bile, earwax, pimple pus- they never consider those substances uniquely disgusting. Only the things men cannot produce are considered inhumanly dirty. 

-Marriage is a trap.

Babies and giving birth is a trap.

Monogamy is a trap.

Heterosexuality is a trap.

Religion is a trap.

“Love” is a trap.

Patriarchy is a trap.

Obedience is a trap.

Tradition is a trap.

Capitalism is a trap.

Society and culture are a trap.

Women in all cultures are trapped by patriarchy.

-The act of classifying sexuality as hetero or homo is based on a frame that appeals to masculine ideals (as defined by patriarchy): you love or are attracted to people based on their genitals. It’s a very genital-oriented view of attraction. “Do you like cock or cunt?”

-Men, in general at least, have underlying homoerotic and phallophilic desires. Yet because of heterosexual edicts a man can’t come out and ask other men for sex. Men, as a class, must therefore wordlessly agree to establish a situation in which homosexual behavior or at least titillation is unavoidable: the locker room. 

Although most men have underlying homoerotic tendencies, no man may ask outright for homosexual contact. A request stems from desire; desire signifies need; need signifies weakness, since, in men’s minds, need means ability to be manipulated via that need, and said manipulation could mean the needy individual being forced, if he is desperate enough, to accept being penetrated- being made a woman. 

Therefore, communal male nudity must be ritualized, normalized, ordained from above, expected, forced by circumstance or tradition, and thrust upon men, who would otherwise have to request it and risk being branded as “needy” and hence wiling to take a subordinate role. 

Communal nudity also establishes generic male bonding and allows men to simultaneously perceive the differences among men (underscoring their supposed individuality) and, on a peculiar flip side of this coin, giving them false ideas about “a normal man’s body” (false due to the fact that many men, particularly those with “inadequate” genitals or abilities, do not use locker rooms). Men use this supposedly accurate knowledge about “normal men’s bodies” (and the access to knowledge about all male genitals, behaviors, and personalities the locker room supposedly gives them) to tell women what men are. This is usually lacking in any mention of male inabilities or physical/psychological/behavioral similarities to women. Women cannot know about men who eschew masculinity or who are physically not oppressor material. 

Categories: Articles In English, Femininity, Gender, History and Political, Homosexuality/LGBT, Liberty Doods, Male Bonding, Masculinity, Patriarchy, PIV, Porn/Prostitution, Race and Ethnicity, Radical Feminism, Sex | Tags: , , , | 6 Comments

پاکستان میں تشدد: خواتین کے لئے

براہ کرم یہ پرنٹ یا دوسری عورتوں کے ساتھ اس کا اشتراک کریں، خاص طور پر اگر وہ ایک کمپیوٹر تک رسائی نہیں ہے.

پاکستان میں خواتین کو اقتصادی، سماجی، شہری اور سیاسی حقوق کی ضرورت نہیں ہے. خواتین تعلیم کا حق سے محروم کر رہے ہیں، اور یہ بھی ان کی شادی اور طلاق کو کنٹرول کرنے کا حق ہے. جو غربت میں پیدا کر رہے ہیں اور لڑکیوں اور عورتوں کو جنسی غلاموں کے طور پر بیچا جاتا ہے. انہوں نے یہ بھی بندوا مزدور کے طور پر شادی، عصمت فروشی، یا کام کے استحصال میں رہنے پر مجبور کر دیا جاتا ہے. اس سے ثابت ہوتا ہے کہ پاکستان میں خواتین اور لڑکیوں کے خلاف امتیازی سلوک ہے.

پاکستانی خواتین گھریلو تشدد اور جسمانی استعمال کی اطلاع، جو عصمت دری شامل ہے، پھینک ایسڈ، جلانے، اور “غیرت کے نام پر” قتل برداشت ہے. یہ اب بھی پاکستان میں وسیع پیمانے پر ہے. ایسڈ پھینک اضافہ ہو رہا ہے. حکومت کو تیزاب کی فروخت تک محدود نہیں ہے. یہ وہ لوگ جو اس کو استعمال کرتے ہوئے خواتین زخمی سزا نہیں ہے. “آنر” قتل روزانہ جاری ہے.

خواتین اور لڑکیوں کو جنسی غلامی میں فروخت کر رہے ہیں. پاکستان گھریلو مشقت کے لئے خواتین کی فروخت کے لئے اصل اور ٹرانزٹ ملک کے ایک ایسے ملک میں ہے، شادی اور جسم فروشی پر مجبور کر دیا. غلامی کے اس فارم کو جرم نیٹ ورک ہے کہ جنوبی ایشیا کے تمام میں موجود کی طرف سے منظم کیا جاتا ہے. دونوں مقامی اور اسمگل خواتین ہلاک کیا ہے اگر وہ جسم فروشی میں پیسہ کمانے سے انکار کر رہے ہیں. نوجوان لڑکیوں کی جبری شادی جاری. اگرچہ غلامی پاکستان میں غیر قانونی ہے، لڑکیوں اور عورتوں کو قرض یا تنازعات کو حل کرنے کے ٹریڈ کی جاتی رہیں. جیسا کہ بلوچستان کے بعض علاقوں پسماندہ یا غریب علاقوں میں لڑکیوں اور بازاروں میں خواتین کی فروخت ہے.

پولیس کی حراست میں عورتوں کی جسمانی استعمال کی اطلاع پاکستان میں اکثر جاری ہے. پولیس اصلاحات کے وعدوں کے باوجود، پولیس دمکانا، ہراساں کرنے اور توہین قیدیوں پر تشدد کا استعمال جاری رکھیں. انہوں نے یہ پیسہ یا معلومات کو نکالنے کے.

تقریبا خواتین کے حقوق کے لئے کوئی مثبت تبدیلی نہیں ہوئی ہے. پاکستان میں حکومت اب بھی ریاست کی تحویل میں بدنام خواتین کے لئے کافی تحفظ فراہم کرنے کے ناکام ہو جاتا ہے، اور خاندان اور کمیونٹی میں اصل میں، تشدد کے متاثرین کی تعداد بڑھ کر ظاہر ہوتا ہے. بہت کم جو خواتین غیرت کے نام پر قتل اور دیگر گھریلو تشدد سے بچنے کر رہے ہیں کی مدد کرنے کے قوانین ہیں. خواتین کے لئے محفوظ گھروں کی کمی ہے. والدین جو شادی میں انتخاب کی آزادی خواتین کے حقوق کو قبول نہیں کرتے ہیں کی طرف سے خواتین کو بچانے کے لئے، کے لئے قابل اعتماد قوانین کی عدم موجودگی ہے. ریاست کی طرف سے قابل اعتماد اور فوری طور پر تحفظ کے ایک غیر موجودگی ہے.

یہ قابل قبول نہیں ہے.

اگرچہ کچھ ترقی ہوئی ہے، بہت کچھ کرنا باقی ہے. مزید خواتین کو ان کے حقوق سے آگاہ ہیں، پاکستان کی خواتین کے حقوق کے گروپوں کا شکریہ، خواتین کام کر رہی ہے، اور انسانی حقوق کی تحریک ہے.

تاہم، Samia سرور اور بہت سے دوسرے کے قاتلوں کو ڈاؤن لوڈ، اتارنا، مفت رہتے ہیں. ( / خواتین میں معافی چاہتا ہوں، یہ انگریزی میں ہے)

پارلیمانی ایکٹ ہے جو کہ واضح طور پر ڈاکو “غیرت کے نام پر” جرائم چاہیے تھا منظور نہیں کیا ہے. پاکستان کے انسانی حقوق کمیشن کی طرف سے ایک سروے میں، اس کی رپورٹ کیا گیا ہے کہ سال 2000 میں عورتوں میں سے تقریبا 90 فی صد کا پتہ نہیں وہ طلاق کا حق حاصل تھا. اس میں خواتین ہیں جو اعلی تعلیم کی گئی ہے!

پاکستان کی حکومت نے “غیرت کے نام پر” جرائم کی مذمت سمیت خواتین کے حقوق کے تحفظ کے عام بیانات بنا دیا ہے. پاکستان اسلامی نظریاتی کونسل سے پوچھا گیا کہ کیا “غیرت کے نام پر” قتل اسلام کے مطابق حلال ہیں. یہ 2000 ء میں ایک خط میں جواب دیا

انہوں نے کہا کہ اگرچہ ویبیچار اسلام کے مطابق کبیرہ گناہ جس کے لیے اسلام نے بہت سخت عذاب مشروع ہے میں سے ایک ہے، کسی نے بھی اس قانون کی طرف سے دوسروں کو سزا کی اجازت ہے کھدرای قتل، کوئی بات نہیں کیا مقصد ہے. قتل کے طور پر ایک ہی ہے “.

تاہم، قانونی اور طریقہ کار تبدیلیاں نہیں ہو چکے ہیں. ہے کہ خواتین کے خلاف امتیازی سلوک کے قوانین کے نرسن کے لئے انسانی حقوق کی تنظیموں کا مطالبہ کر رہے ہیں. ایک مثال کے طور پر زنا آرڈیننس اور ثبوت ایکٹ ہے. ایک اور Qisas اور Diyat قانون ہے. اس قتل کے شکار کے خاندان مجرم کو بخش دے اور استغاثہ سے اسے بچانے کے کی اجازت دیتا ہے ہے.

یہ قابل قبول نہیں ہے.

اگر عورتوں کی جا رہی ہیں ایسڈ کی طرف سے ہلاک ہو گئے ہیں یا جنسی غلامی اور شادی کرنے پر مجبور کیا جا رہا ہے، تو وہ پاکستان جب تک ملک میں خواتین کے حقوق کو قبول کرتا ہے سے فرار ہونے کی ضرورت ہے.


یہ انگریزی میں ایک بلاگ (پھر، میں معافی چاہتا ہوں) جس میں فرار پاکستان کہا جاتا ہے کے بعد تیار کیا گیا ہے:

یہ سال 2009 میں لکھا گیا تھا تو میں جانتا ہوں کہ اگر معلومات ابھی بھی اچھا نہیں ہے. میں نے اس میں سے کچھ کا ترجمہ کرنے کی کوشش کریں، اگرچہ مصنف شاید اردو بولتا ہے اور اگر تم نے انہیں انٹرنیٹ پر پیغام:

ہیلو، ریڈر!

اس بلاگ کا مقصد پاکستان سے بچنے کے لئے اور ایک مہذب اور محفوظ زندگی کا پیچھا درکار تمام معلومات فہرست ہے.

میں نے طریقہ کار میں میری امیگریشن کی درخواست دینے کیلئے کیا تھا درج ہے. میں ہے:

پیدائش کا سرٹیفکیٹ
لاہور میں پاسپورٹ (لاہور)
پولیس سرٹیفکیٹ
ڈرائیونگ لائسنس
سرکاری دستاویزات
شادی سرٹیفکیٹ اندراج
پاکستان کے خارجہ امور کی وزارت کے ذریعے تصدیق
ایچ ای سی کے ذریعے ڈگری کی توثیق

اور … مزید

طریقہ کار میں سے کچھ میں ان کے لئے بھر نہیں تھا. میں اپنے حلقہ سے ذاتی اکاؤنٹس میں شامل ہوں گے. یہ عمل قابل اطلاق اور (لاہور) لاہور کے لئے درست ہیں.

کے علاوہ، آپ اپنی کہانی کا تعاون، جو میں یہاں سے شائع، زیادہ سے زیادہ لوگوں کی مدد کرنے کے لئے کر سکتے ہیں.

ایک اچھا دن ہے.

ایک پیدائش کا سرٹیفکیٹ حاصل کس طرح

تجویز کردہ تقاضے:
1. پیدائش کا سرٹیفکیٹ فارم
2. والد NIC
3. ماں NIC
آپ کے NIC سے پیدائش کا سرٹیفکیٹ کی درخواست اپنے والدین کی طرف سے پیش کیا جاتا ہے پر غور نہیں کیا جائے گا.
نوٹ: اس بات کا یقین کر لیں کہ آپ کو اپنے آپ کے وزٹرز کا ایک ہفتے کے اندر اندر رجسٹرڈ کی گئی ہے. تم نے اپنے والدین سے اس بات کی تصدیق کرنے کی ضرورت ہے.
یہ رجسٹریشن تاریخ (Tareekh ای Indraaj) بہت بہت ضروری ہے. اگر اس تاریخ حکومت کے ڈیٹا بیس میں موجود ہی نہیں ہے، یہ ایک مسئلہ ہے. اور ہر مسئلے کے لئے ایک قیمت ہے. تو تیار ہو.

1. اپنے علاقے کے ناظم کے دفتر میں جاؤ. (اگر آپ کینٹ کے علاقے میں پیدا نہیں کیا گیا)

2. مندرجہ بالا دستاویزات کی کسی کے ساتھ انہیں فراہم کریں.
قیمت: روپے. 1200 / – (لیکن 800-900 طرح ایک کم قیمت بھی ایک درست فیس ہے)
ایک یا 2 دن کے اندر اندر: وقت

: دیگر
1. سٹی ٹاؤن ہال کے پاس جاؤ. تمام ریکارڈ اور معلومات کے لئے سب سے بہترین جگہ ہے.

ٹاؤن ہال ہال / شہر ایک بڑے نقشے میں دیکھیں.

pepal درخت اور انسان کے تحت ہدایات کے لئے پوچھو کرنے کے لئے آپ کو درست شخص کی طرف اشارہ کریں گے.

3. اس شخص کو تمام مطلوبہ دستاویزات کو جمع، اگر آپ رجسٹریشن تاریخ کمپیوٹر ریکارڈ میں موجود ہے اس بات کی تصدیق کریں اور آپ کو مطلع کریں گے.

4. اگر سب کچھ اچھی طرح سے جاتا ہے، آپ کو آپ کی پیدائش کا سرٹیفکیٹ پڑے گا:
قیمت: روپے. 1200 / –
وقت: 3-4 دن
نوٹ: اگر رجسٹریشن تاریخ نہیں پایا جاتا ہے، کی قیمت 2-3 اوقات جاتا ہے لیکن یہ اب بھی ہے سمجھوتا.
مندرجہ ذیل ہے جو پیدائش کا سرٹیفکیٹ کی طرح لگتا ہے

پولیس کریکٹر سرٹیفکیٹ کیسے
(لاہور) لاہور میں پولیس سرٹیفیکیٹ حاصل کرنا حیرت انگیز آسان اور سادہ ہے.

آسان اقدامات یہ ہیں:
کی ضرورت:
1. 4 پاسپورٹ سائز تصاویر
2. ایس ایس پی جہاں آپ جاتے ہیں، اور سب پتہ ہے کہ تم رہ رہے ہیں کا ارادہ رکھتے ہیں کی وضاحت پولیس کو ایک درخواست ہے. (اس کے ہاتھ سے لکھا جائے کیا جا سکتا ہے)

3. درست پاسپورٹ
4. نادرا قومی شناختی کارڈ
5. پولیس سرٹیفیکیٹ فارم، ایس ایس پی کے دفتر میں دستیاب

مرحلہ نمبر 1. پولیس سرٹیفیکیٹ فارم پر آپ کی معلومات رکھو اور ایس ایس پی آفس جاؤ، لاہور (لاہور). جگہ گورنمنٹ کالج کے قریب ہے، لاہور (لاہور)، ملتان روڈ:

ایک بڑے نقشے میں ایس ایس پی آفس

مرحلہ نمبر 2. احاطے میں داخل ہونے کے بعد، ٹھیک ہے کی باری ہے اور ایک بڑے کمرے میں آگے بڑھنے.

مرحلہ 3. انہیں پولیس سرٹیفیکیٹ فارم، تصاویر، اور درخواست کرو. ذاتی آپ کو 4-5 دن کا وقت دے گی. جو عام وقت ہے اور یہ 1 دن کو کم کیا جا سکتا ہے اگر آپ کو نقطہ نظر ہے.

مرحلہ 4. ایک پولیس افسر نے چند دنوں میں آپ کے گھر میں آپ کا دورہ (وہ اذان سے پہلے آنے والے ہو سکتا ہے). انہوں نے آپ سوال پوچھ کی طرف سے پولیس سرٹیفکیٹ فارم کو پر کریں گے.

مرحلہ نمبر 5. 4-5 دنوں کے بعد ایس ایس پی دفتر جاؤ، اور ایک ہی کمرے میں جاؤ.

مرحلہ 6. آپ کی درخواست کو تلاش کریں اور اسے مہر اور بیچ میں عرض کئے گئے. یہ بیچ کے ایس ایس پی لاہور (لاہور) کے سامنے میں ظاہر کریں گے.

مرحلہ 7. ایک قطار ہے اور ایس ایس پی دفتر، جو آپ کے نام کو فون کریں اور سرٹیفکیٹ پر دستخط کریں گے.

8 قدم ہے. آپ کو امیگریشن کے لئے ایک پولیس کا سرٹیفکیٹ ہے.

ایک پاکستانی پاسپورٹ کیسے حاصل
یہ مراسلہ لاہور (لاہور) جو اٹھ جلد ہی احساس ہے کہ فرار ضروری ہے کافی میں رہنے والے پاکستانی شہریوں پر لاگو ہوتا ہے.

پاکستانی پاسپورٹ اب ڈیجیٹل ہے. اس کا مطلب یہ ہے کہ میرے جیسے بدقسمتی سے لوگ ہیں جو پرانے پاسپورٹ کی ضرورت تھی کیا جائے گا اسے دوبارہ بنانے کے لئے. لیکن لوگوں کے لیے جو پرانے پاسپورٹ ہے کوئی خاص عمل ہے. ہی عمل کو لاگو ہوتا ہے.

چیزیں جو آپ کی ضرورت ہے:
1. رو. 3000 / – کیش.
2. شناختی کارڈ چند فوٹو کاپیاں کے ساتھ.

ملوث اقدامات کی فہرست ہے:

صبح میں مرحلہ نمبر 1) تقریبا 9 ذیل کے طور پر گارڈن ٹائون میں مارکیٹ برکت کارروائی:

یہاں آپ کو نیشنل بینک آف پاکستان کے حاصل کر سکتے ہیں:

دیکھیں نیشنل بینک، ایک بڑے نقشے میں Barket مارکیٹ

یا تو
ا) خالی بھر ہے اور باہر بوت پر جمع فارم کو دے کے باہر ایک بینک گارڈ تلاش کریں. جی ہاں، یہ ایک لمبی لائن ہے!
وقت: 10-15 منٹ
قیمت: روپے. 2230 کچھ پاسپورٹ کی فیس + روپے 70 (پرکرامی) ایجنٹ کی فیس = روپے ہے. 2300
ب) ایک ایجنٹ (لکڑی کے بینچوں پر بیٹھے لوگوں کو) آپ فارم کو حاصل کرنے کے لئے اور واجبات ادا کریں جبکہ آپ کی چھایا میں بیٹھ بولو.
وقت: قطار پر منحصر ہے.
قیمت: روپے. 2230 کچھ پاسپورٹ کی فیس

موہردار رسید جو کہ 2-3 ماہ کی طرح کے لئے درست ہے.

اب آپ کے گھر یا پاسپورٹ آفس میں منتقل کر سکتے ہیں.

مرحلہ نمبر 2) پاسپورٹ آفس گارڈن ٹائون میں خواتین، لاہور (لاہور) کے لئے کالج Himayat اسلام کی پشت پر واقع ہے. یہ نیشنل بینک یا برکت مارکیٹ سے چلنے فاصلے ہے. کار پارک ایک بڑا مسئلہ ہے. میں پاسپورٹ آفس (OH اور اس کے مفت) کے طور پر ایک ہی سڑک پر اس کالج کے سامنے پارک کی سفارش کریں گے. ذیل میں دفتر کا جائے وقوع تلاش کریں:

یہاں آپ یہ کر سکتے ہیں:

یا تو

ایک. پولیس رسید دکھائیں اور احاطے کو درست کرنے کے لئے قطار کو تلاش کرنے کے لئے درج کریں. قطار میں سے کچھ حصہ سایہ میں ہے. دوسروں کو اتنی خوش نہیں ہیں.


ب. کے احاطے کے باہر ایجنٹوں کو تلاش کریں. وہ رومنگ اور کلائنٹس، یا لوگ بینچوں پر بیٹھے دیکھ کر پایا جا سکتا ہے ہے. ایجنٹ روپے کا مطالبہ کریں گے. 700 + (مکمل طور پر بات چیت (تجویز کردہ). سودا، اور جو بھی قیمت اور طریقہ کار آپ کے لئے سب سے پسند ہے، آپ کو حتمی شکل دینے وقت یہ لیتا ہے 15 منٹ ہے. کر سکتے ہیں آپ کی گاڑی میں یا خوبصورت گرین پارک میں سایہ کے تحت انتظار.

مرحلہ 2 کے پیداوار میں ایک ڈیجیٹل ٹوکن ہونا چاہئے. یہ ٹوکن ضروری ہے! یہ مت کھو! یہ ٹوکن ایک تاریخ ہے جس پر آپ کو پاسپورٹ آفس دوبارہ کا دورہ ہے بھی ہوگا.

پاسپورٹ آفس میں مرحلہ 3). احاطے میں درج کریں اور براہ راست آگے بڑھنے کے بہت سے لوگوں کے ساتھ ایک بڑے کمرے میں. یہ اچھی بات ہے کہ اس کمرے میں واتانکولیت ہے اور کافی کرسیاں ہے. کوئی ایجنٹوں کے اس مرحلے میں ملوث رہے ہیں، لیکن اس نقطہ نظر لاگو ہوتا ہے (اگر آپ انتہائی انتہائی درجہ بندی سیٹ میں کسی کو درجہ بندی). یہ سب کچھ تسلسل میں جاتا ہے. آپ کے ٹوکن نمبر کہا جاتا ہے اور (اگر مجھے یاد ہے) ظاہر ہے.

اقدامات سادہ ہیں. 4 بوتھس ہیں اور آپ کو ان میں سے ہر ایک کے ذریعے ہی تسلسل میں جانے کی ہے.

میں. اپنی انگلی کو اسکین.

II. آپ کی ڈیجیٹل تصویر لیا ہو جاؤ. جی ہاں، آخر میں آپ کو لینے کی ضرورت نہ
ان پاسپورٹ سائز تصاویر!

ة. آپ کی آبادی کی تصدیق (نگرانی کی وجہ سے کچھ فرق ہو سکتا ہے کی ضرورت ہے). یہ ڈیٹا نادرا کی طرف سے نکالا ہے.

IV. ایک افسر سے تاریخ حاصل کریں. مجھے پتہ نہیں کیوں اس بوت موجود نہیں ہے. وہاں کیا اتنا بھی نہیں ہے، لہذا صرف افسر. وہ تمہیں دیکھتا ہے اور اپنے پاسپورٹ لینے کے لئے ایک تاریخ کی تفویض کرتا ہے.

گھر جاؤ.

جو بھی تاریخ کو اپنا پاسپورٹ جمع کرنے کا ذکر ہے ایک اعلی کا موقع (98 فیصد) دیر 3-4 دن ہو گا ہے. میرا دیر ایک ہفتے کا تھا اور میں نے وہ سیکھا 3 دوروں کے بعد.

تو آپ کا ذکر تاریخ پر پاسپورٹ آفس تکیا دن +. پولیس نے آپ کی رسید دکھائیں. احاطے میں درج کریں اور ٹوکن حاصل کرنے قطار ماضی انتہائی حق پر منتقل کرنے کے لئے،. وہاں آپ کو ایک بوتھ اور کچھ لوگ پہلے ہی وہاں ان کے پاسپورٹ کا دعوی ملے گی. پاسپورٹ 10 بیچ یا ایک ہی تعداد میں کے حوالے کیا جائے گا. جلد از جلد آپ کو شروع کرنے کیلئے، بہتر ہے. بیچ آپ کی رسید پر مشتمل ہے. اور اگر آپ کا پاسپورٹ تیار ہے آپ کو آپ کو اصل شناختی کارڈ دکھا کر اسے جمع کر سکتے ہیں. اگر نہیں، تو وہ آپ کو ایک نئی تاریخ تفویض کرے گی.

اچھا ہے! آپ کو آپ کی ڈیجیٹل پاسپورٹ ہے. معلومات کے بعد کبھی کبھی یہ غلط چھپی ملےگا کی تصدیق کریں.

یہ معلومات مئی 2009 تک درست ہے. مجھے یقین نہیں عمل / کے نظام میں کوئی تبدیلی نہیں ہے.

Categories: Foreign Language (Translations), Indian/South Asian, Marriage/Monogamy, Murder, Patriarchy, Politics and Current Events, Pragmatic Activism, Radical Feminism, Violence and Abuse, اردو (Urdu) | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Women in Pakistan- Escape! (English)

For Women: Violence in Pakistan

Women in Pakistan do not have economic, social, civil and political rights. Women are denied the right to education, and also the right to control their marriage and divorce. Girls and women who are born into poverty and are sold as sex slaves.  They are also forced into marriage, prostitution or work exploitation such as bonded labor. This proves there is discrimination against women and girls in Pakistan.

Pakistani women endure domestic violence and physical abuse, which includes rape, acid throwing, burning, and “honor” killings.  This is still widespread in Pakistan. Acid-throwing is increasing. The government has not restricted the sale of acid.  It has not punished those who use it to injure women. “Honor” killings continue daily.

Women and girls are sold into sexual slavery.  Pakistan is a country of origin and a transit country for the selling of women for domestic labor, forced marriage and prostitution. This form of slavery is organized by crime networks that exist in all of South Asia. Both local and trafficked women are killed if they refuse to earn money in prostitution. Forced marriage of young girls continue. Even though slavery is illegal in Pakistan, girls and women continue to be traded to settle debts or conflicts. The sale of girls and women in markets is reported in underdeveloped or poor areas such as parts of Balochistan.

Physical abuse of women in police custody continues often in Pakistan. Despite promises of police reform, police continue to use torture to intimidate, harass and humiliate detainees.  They do this to extract money or information.

Almost no positive changes have taken place for women’s rights. The government in Pakistan still fails to provide enough protection for abused women in the custody of the state, and in the family and community. In fact, the number of victims of violence appears to have risen. There are very few laws to help women who are escaping honor killing and other domestic violence.  There is a lack of safe houses for women.  There is an absence of reliable laws to save women from parents who do not accept women’s rights to freedom of choice in marriage. There is an absence of reliable and prompt protection by the state.

This is not acceptable.

Even though some progress has been made, much remains to be done. More women are aware of their rights, thanks to the Pakistani women’s rights groups, working women, and the human rights movement.

However, the killers of Samia Sarwar  and many others remain free. (  I apologize it is in English)

The Parliamentary act that was supposed to explicitly outlaw “honor” crimes did not pass. In one survey by the Human Rights Commission of Pakistan, it was reported that in the year 2000, almost 90 percent of women did not know they had the right to divorce.  This includes women who were highly educated!

The government of Pakistan has made general statements on the protection of women’s rights, including condemning “honor” crimes.  The Pakistan Council of Islamic Ideology was asked whether “honor” killings are lawful according to Islam. It replied in a letter in the year 2000

“Although sexual immorality is one of the major sins according to Islam for which Islam has prescribed very severe punishment, nobody is allowed to punish others on the behalf of this law. Willful homicide, no matter what the the motive, is the same as murder.”

However, legal and procedural changes have not occurred.  Human rights organizations are calling for repeal of laws that discriminate against women.  One example is the Zina Ordinance and the Evidence Act.  Another is the Qisas and Diyat law. This allows the family of a murder victim to forgive the perpetrator and save him from prosecution.

This is not acceptable.
If women are being killed by acid or are being forced into sexual slavery and marriage, then they need to escape Pakistan until the country accepts women’s rights.
This is a blog in English (again, I apologize) which is called Escape Pakistan:
It was written in the year 2009, so I do not know if the information is still good.  I will try to translate some of it, although the writer probably speaks Urdu if you message them over the internet:
Hello, reader!
The purpose of this blog is to list all the information required to escape Pakistan and pursue a dignified and secure life.
I have listed procedures I had to do to apply for my immigration. I got:
  1. Birth certificate
  2. Passport in Lahore
  3. Police certificate
  4. Driving license
  5. Notarizing documents
  6. Marriage certificate registeration
  7. Verification through Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Pakistan
  8. Degree validation through HEC
and more…
Some of the procedures I did not go through for them. I would add personal accounts from my close circle. These processes are applicable and valid for Lahore.
Also, you can contribute your story, which I would publish here, to assist more and more people.

Have a nice day.

How to get a Birth Certificate

Recommended Requirements:

1. Birth certificate form
2. Father’s NIC
3. Mother’s NIC
Your NIC would not be considered since birth certificate application is submitted on behalf of your parents.
NOTE: Make sure you were registered within a week of your birth. You need to verify that from your parents.
This registration date (Tareekh-e-Indraaj) is very very important. If this date does not exist in the Government’s database it is a problem. And for every problem there is a cost. So be prepared.
1. Go to your area’s Nazim office. (If you weren’t born in Cantt area) 2. Provide them with any of the above documents.
Cost: Rs. 1200/- (But a lower price like 800-900 is also a valid fee)
Time: Within a day or 2

1. Go to City Town Hall. The best place for all records and information. View Town Hall / City Hall in a larger map

Ask for directions under the pepal tree and person there would point you to the right person.
3. That person would collect all required documents, verify if your registration date exists in the computer records and inform you.
4. If all goes well, you will have your birth certificate in:
Cost: Rs. 1200/-
Time: 3-4 Days
NOTE: If registration date is not found, the cost would go up 2-3 times but it is still negotiable.
Following is what the birth certificate now looks like:

How to get a Police Character Certificate

Getting a police certificate in Lahore is amazingly easy and simple.
Here are simple steps:
1. 4 passport sized photographs
2. An application to SSP Police explaining where you intend to go, and all the address that you have lived. (this may be written by hand) 3. Valid Passport

4. NADRA National Identification Card
5. Police Certificate Form, available at SSP office STEP 1. Put your information on the Police Certificate Form and Go to SSP Office, Lahore. Location is near Government College, Lahore, Multan Road:

View SSP Office in a larger map

STEP 2. After entering the premises, turn right and proceed to a big room.

STEP 3. Give them the Police Certificate Form, photos, and application. The personal would give you 4-5 days time. That is the normal time and it can be reduced to 1 day if you have approach.

STEP 4. A police officer would visit you at your home in a few days (he might call before coming). He would fill Police Certificate Form by asking you questions.

STEP 5. Go to SSP office after 4-5 days, and go to the same room.

STEP 6. Find your application and get it stamped and submitted to a batch. This batch would appear in front of SSP Lahore.

STEP 7. Make a queue and go to SSP’s office, who would call your name and sign the certificate.

STEP 8. You have a Police Certificate for immigration.

How to get a Pakistani Passport

This post applies to Pakistani citizens residing in Lahore who have woken up soon enough to realize that escape is important.
Pakistani passport is now digitized . This means that unfortunate people like me who had old passport would be required to make it again. But there is no special route for people who have old passport.  The same process applies.
Things you need:
1. Around Rs. 3000/- cash.
2. Identification card with a few photocopies.
Here is the list of steps involved:
STEP 1) Around 9 in the morning proceed to Barkat Market in Garden Town as below:
Here you can find National Bank of Pakistan:
View National Bank, Barket Market in a larger map
a) Find a bank guard outside giving empty forms to be filled and deposited on the booth outside. yes it is a long line!!!
Time: 10-15 Minutes
Cost: Rs. 2230 something passport fee + Rs. 70 (negotiable) agent fee = Rs. 2300
b) Speak to an agent (men sitting on wooden benches) to get you the form and pay the dues while you sit in the shade.
Time: depending on the queue.
Cost: Rs. 2230 something passport fee
Get a stamped receipt which is valid for like 2-3 months.
Now you can either go home or move to the Passport office.
STEP 2) Passport office is located at the back of Himayat-e-Islam college for women in Garden Town, Lahore. It is a walking distance from National Bank or Barkat market. Car park is a big problem. I would recommend to park it in front of a college on the same road as passport office (oh and its free). Find the office location below:
View Passport Office in a larger map
Here you can:
a. Show the police dude the receipt and enter the premises to find a queue to the right. Some part of the queue is in shade others are not so lucky.
b. Find agents outside the premises. They can be found roaming rather stalking for clients or people sitting on benches. Agent would ask for Rs. 700+ (totally negotiable (recommended!) ) . Bargain, and whatever rocks your boat finalize. Time 15 minutes wait in your car or under shade in lush green park.
Output of step 2 should be a digital token. This token is everything do not loose this! This token would also have a date on which you have to visit passport office again.
STEP 3) At the passport office. Enter the premises and proceed straight forward into a big room with a lot of people. Luckily this room is air conditioned and have enough seats to get you seated. No agents are involved in this step but approach applies (if you have highly ranked someone at a highly ranked seat). Here everything goes in sequence. Your token number is called out and displayed (if I remember).
So the steps are simple 4 booths and you have to go through each of them, in sequence.
i. Get your fingers scanned.
ii. Get your digital photographed taken (yeah finally you dont need to take
those passport size photos)
iii. Get your demographics verified (vigilance is required there may be
discrepancies). This data is pulled from NADRA.
iv. Get a date from some officer. Don’t know why this booth exists. Nothing much to
do there just go the officer he sees you and assign a date to pick your
passport up.
Go home.
Whatever the date is mentioned to collect your passport there is a high (98%) chance it would be late 3-4 days. Mine was late a week and I found that out after 3 visits.
So you go the passport office on mentioned date + cushion days. Show the police dude your receipt. Enter the premises and move to the extreme right, past the queue getting tokens. There you would find a booth and some people already there claiming their passports. Passport would be handed out in batch of 10 so the sooner you initiate, if not already done, the batch the better. Batch would contain your receipt. And if your passport is ready you can collect it by showing you original ID card else they would assign you a new date.
There you go, you have your digital passport. Verify the information on in since sometimes it gets mis-printed.

This information is valid as of May 2009. I highly doubt there would have been any change in the process/system.

Categories: Articles In English, Indian/South Asian, Marriage/Monogamy, Murder, Patriarchy, Pragmatic Activism, Radical Feminism, Violence and Abuse | Tags: , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Some controversial thoughts on male homosexuality

Some thoughts on the issue, in no particular order.




I’m not quite sure how it happened, the current opposition to gays and homosexuality that many men feel.  Why do they hate gays so much?  What caused this all?  When?  There are a few theories I have about why men have hated gays, supported gays, hated lesbians, and why they sometimes hate one more than another:
1. They seemed to hate lesbians more than gays a few hundred years ago, during the early witch hunt eras, like when the prospect of a woman resisting marriage to a man was very dangerous to them, and there was no sexual liberation that allowed them to fuck and chuck any woman.
2. They seemed to somewhat ignore or try to block out the knowledge of gays or lesbians during the Victorian Era, since sex in general was immoral, and so was sexual deviance.  Gays were hated when discussed, but lesbians were invisible since women didn’t have sexual desires, they said.  Perhaps this was…better?…for the lesbians?  I don’t know.
3. Today being gay is severely punished, while being lesbian is called evil but is a little more ignored, or just considered butch, or lesbians get eyerolls or such.  This isn’t because these men hate women less, it’s because they are more focused on the horrifying prospect that men are being dominated by other men, and that they are being turned into women.  So, it is actually because they hate women so much they hate gays.   They still hate Lesbians, it’s just that the topic doesn’t always come up as much.



I’ve noticed that a lot of the people opposed to homosexuality are women, especially religious women.  I wondered why this was, since women are oppressed as well as gays and since the oppression was along similar lines- sex and gender.  Then I started to feel like it might have something to do with this whole nervousness about sex and the body, especially the male body (since anti-homosexuality campaigns usually refer to male homosexuals).  Maybe women were offended by male bodies and male sexuality, so male homosexuality made them afraid.  Therefore they became conservative on the matter.


Then I figured that some instances of homosexuality on the part of men might be fueled by female hatred.  Homosexuals in the Victorian Era, like Oscar Wilde, often disliked women, eve though the popular stereotype is of homosexuals being effeminate.  A key reason may have been because they attracted to their own sex precisely because they disliked the other, much like the rugged cowboy, sick and tired of silly women, bonded in a sexual way with his own rugged brothers.

For example, the 2005 film Brokeback Mountain documents the fictional life of two cowboys who struggle with their homosexual attraction to each other, and the men seem to somewhat see the wives and children as a bit of a burden, annoying and frustrating their desires. These two men long to get away from their wives and kids and go out in the mountains and have an all-male homosexual relationship.




When the masculinity supporting homosexuals use phrases like “you’re homophobic”, they really mean to mock people’s fear- their fear of sex and heterosexuals’ fear of differing sexualities.  It’s just like what men do to women who are afraid to have sex- they like to mock the “effeminate” fear of sex.

For these types of homosexual men, being against homophobia is not about tolerance and justice; it’s about the unacceptability of having a fear of sex, the unacceptability of having a fear of maleness and the male body, or fear of frightening and unknown sexual behavior.  It’s also about, not tolerance for justice’s sake, but about tolerance in the sense that they want to be able to perform any kinds of sexual activities they want and with any kind of partner.

Objectively, there’s nothing wrong with homosexuality, either male or female.  But to a woman who is frightened enough already about the whole topic of sex, frightened because of the behavior of men…do you think she’s going to react with logic and acceptance and tolerance, and without any fear when you introduce a whole foreign concept of sexuality and behavior to her, especially a totally male-centric one as male homosexuality?

Many women are opposed to both homosexuality and to lesbianism in theory, but are able to harbor and accept attractions to other women.  This may be because they see homosexuality and other forms of sexuality which include one or more male partners to be threatening.  It may also be because since the word “homosexuality” implies an attraction based upon physical body parts- i.e., it is an attraction towards a person’s physical, sexual body parts- and women see it as unemotional and are put off by the purely physical aspect of it.  They are put off by the idea that one’s sexual attractions should be determined by the body parts of the partner.  That’s what the average man is attracted by, they think.  Someone’s body parts.

Also, because they live in a male-run society, women define “sex” solely as a physical thing…but, being women (who have to bear the painful role in sexual activity) they think they don’t like sex.  Since any woman-woman relationships are going to include more love, and have less sex (or at least tie sex in with romantic love), they fail to recognize the relationship as a sexual one, and hence, a homosexual one, and therefore do not consider themselves lesbians.  After all, they figure, they can’t be homosexual if they aren’t having sex.

To sum it up, many women consider the subject of homosexuality frightening because it seems sexually exotic (and therefore dangerous), and because they believe that male homosexuality is too full of masculinity (two men) to be non-threatening.


I’m wondering if this whole idea that most gays are effeminate is not an attempt to trick women into supporting the typical homosexual- the uber male who loves other males because they are male.  “It’s okay, we’re all into shopping and clothes and scented candles and puppies and purple!”  But are most homosexual not like that?  Do the masculine homosexuals push around the feminine ones? It seems so.




Here’s what a lot of anti-gay women, or women who think they’re anti-gay, are thinking about the gay rights movement:

you guys have been allowed to fuck each other for god knows how long, in every society, even if it’s just in dark corners or secret clubs.  We have been begging to have the kind of sex we want without getting murdered as witches or mutilated by doctors to cure our lesbianism.  Not to mention the other abuses we suffer from being forced to accept your heterosexuality into our lives.  And now you have the nerve to come out and complain that you aren’t exactly being treated like how human beings are supposed to be treated, that you aren’t getting your assed pleasured as many times as you want, that your behavior is subject to a few penalties which you have to power to at least protest properly, while we don’t?

The gay issue is only an issue because it mainly involves men (lesbians are invisible to them) and because it involves regulations against sexual behavior.  If only lesbians existed in the universe, you can bet gay rights would never have become an issue at all.




The gay marriage and gay sex question, for men, is about getting to do whatever they want; for women, it’s about being fair to others.  So you can see who has the better handle on what social justice means.


I was reading an article on the Radical Hub site and they were talking about male homosexuality and how taboo it is, and one commenter was like, “Where is male homosexuality taboo?  Men’s institutions are cemented by it, the priesthood, the public school, the army and navy, anywhere men gather in groups without women being present.  The taboo is on admitting it to women, and that, depending on the degree of patriarchy present in any given society, can be punishable by death.  Because it is breaking the code of the boys club, which corrals women’s bodies by controlling their minds.  Women must religiously follow heterosexual edicts, men are exempt.”


Ask any good history student, and they’ll tell you that men have been free to fuck each other all throughout history, with a few bans occurring on and off, often from women or from “effeminate” areas in the Church and from other moral-peddlers in society.

In Ancient Greece they were allowed- no, encouraged– to do it.

Ancient Rome, I believe, frowned on it a bit more but didn’t do much about it.

Alexander the Great was gay.

The Spartans were often gay.

Roman emperors had perverse sex with little boys.  (Google “Tiberius and his minnows”)

Sodom and Gomorrah in the ancient Middle East.

Jewish mohels who suck baby boys’ newly circumcised penises.

The Turkish bath sort of places and nude swim areas the classical era men attended to escape women.

The earliest Popes, who compared boys’ naked bottoms to the texture of a peach, and later Popes who instituted orgies in their halls.

Asian sexual practices in India and China and Japan with two young males or one adult male and one younger one.

Various European kings and princes and politicians, sometimes (or often) soldiers.

Masons and other “secret societies”- yeah, we know your secret!- during the American Revolution and the European Enlightenment and other eras.

Gay princes and composers and oddball writers in the 19th Century, like Oscar Wilde.

Cowboys in the old American West, and of course, Brokeback Mountain.

Actors, singers, and other artists who dabble in gay orgies or fuckfests both on and off the screen/stage/paper.

Modern monarchs like Prince Charles, who are caught engaging in homosexual activity at various times, a counterpart to their 19th Century and older European counterparts.

Locker rooms, restrooms, bathroom troughs, and steam rooms, even public street urinals in modern Europe in which men often show off to each other.

Muslim training schools and madrassas where men learn how to praise Allah and bone little boys.


What these men oppose when they’re opposing restrictions against homosexuality is not the unfairness of it all, or the pain and rejection that many homosexual men (mostly the effeminate variety) suffer at the hands of patriarchal men. They oppose, instead, not being able to do whatever they want to do, especially sexually.  They oppose not being allowed to have sex with other men, and hypocritically, they cry out against the “tyranny” of the Church and Victorian Era and other establishments- which they instituted themselves!- and blame the rare good aspects of the Church and religion and morality and all that, for acting “feminine” and not allowing them to have sex or revel in their masculinity. (The good aspects being “don’t hurt the innocent”, “everything in moderation”, “don’t be sexually irresponsible”, “look out for the little guy”, etc).


The fact that they aren’t able to open a simple history book and look at how unrestricted male homosexual sex has been in the past attests to their refusal to be objective and logical, and not to mention their uneducated demeanor whenever they approach any and all issues.   It also proves the casualness with which they blame people who are totally innocent in regards to restricting their disgusting behavior (nagging women, disgusted churchgoers, whiny priests, etc).


You think women cared if they went off and fucked other men?  They were probably happy to have them out of their hands, like Marie Barone is happy to see Frank go to the lodge in Everybody Loves Raymond.  Thank God for the mother fucking lodge!


And lots of the authorities that opposed homosexuality, even if they had stereotypically feminine reasons for doing so, like “morality”, or “safety”, they were established by males, and it was males who banned the behavior.


This aspect of history, the aspect of men screaming about how they aren’t allowed to be homosexual, it reads much more like men trying to regulate other men’s behavior, or even their own behavior……and then getting angry at women who chime in on the wrong side.  If you support homosexual men, you’re a witch.  If you oppose it, you’re a bitch.  Or an old crazy broad.  If you think about it, the issue of males being allowed to be homosexual is almost exclusively an issue that concerns them.  Men regulating other men and punishing them if they step out of line.


The only time women are involved is when they are used as cannon fodder for the anti-homosexual side to fight the opposition, or vice versa.  And of course, for when one side wants to attack the others’ cannon fodder (women), because heaven knows they would rather attack a woman whom their opponent has brainwashed to oppose them than attack another man, even one with violently different opinions. So I guess on a certain level, men love each other so much that most of them are homosexuals.  Some are just repressed and that’s what makes the differences of political opinion.



If you’re an effeminate man, and you love another man and sexually attract to him for proper reasons, then you’re a pussy.  If you’re a woman, then you’re a cunt.  You can’t win.  It sucks.  Welcome to history class.

(I am ¾ done with a bachelors in history so I can kinda say that).

Categories: Articles In English, History and Political, Homosexuality/LGBT, Lesbianism, Patriarchy, Radical Feminism, Sex, Sexual Liberation | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

நான் இந்திய பெண்கள் என்னை உடன்படவில்லை என்று நான் நம்புகிறேன்:

இந்திய ஆண்கள் பெரும்பாலான மலம் என்ற கேவலமான துண்டுகள் மற்றும் வாழ அல்லது மூச்சு தகுதி எனக்கு இல்லை. சில நல்ல இருக்கும். ஆனால் மிகவும் மோசமாக உள்ளது. அவர்கள் உலகில் மிக, ஆபாச முட்டாள், சோம்பேறி, மற்றும் தீய ஆண்கள் இருக்கிறார்கள். அவர்கள் திருமண தவறாக பெண்கள் குற்றம். அவர்கள் தங்கள் அழகை தந்திரம் கணவர்கள் பெண்கள் குற்றம். அவர்கள் பசு வழிபாடு ஆனால் பெண்கள் மற்றும் குழந்தை பெண்கள் பட்டினி நாம். அவர்கள் பெண்கள் சொத்து நம்புகிறேன். அவர்கள் தங்கள் மனைவிகளை கொலை மற்றும் தங்கள் பணத்தை எடுத்து. அவர்கள் பாலியல் பார்க்க தெருவில் இளம் பெண்கள் பின்பற்ற. அவர்கள் இணையத்தில் அமெரிக்க பெண்களுடன் தொடர்பு உள்ளது முயற்சி. அவர்கள் அமெரிக்க மற்றும் ஐரோப்பிய பெண்கள் அவர்களை பாலியல் கொடுக்க அதிகமாக நம்புகிறேன்.

என் படிக்க வேண்டும் இந்திய ஆண்கள் மிக ஆபாச தேடுகிறாய். அவர்கள் ஹிந்தி ஆராயப்பட. அவர்கள் தமிழ் தேடியது. அவர்கள் குஜராத்தி ஆராயப்பட. அவர்கள் பெங்காலி ஆராயப்பட. இந்த ஒலி மற்றும் எழுத்து இருவரும், அழகான மொழி ஆகும். இந்த ஆண்கள் மொழிகளை தீட்டாகிவிடும். அவர்கள், “குத செக்ஸ்”, மற்றும் “நிர்வாண படங்கள்” “ஆண்குறி கருப்பை நுழையும்”, போன்ற “யோனி உள்ள ஆண்குறி” என்ற சொற்றொடர்களை தேடி.

நான் இந்தியா பற்றி படிக்க வேண்டும். இது ஒரு நல்ல பாரம்பரியத்தின் ஒரு அழகான நாடு. இசை நல்ல. நல்ல உணவு. நல்ல கலை. ஆடை நல்ல. அழகான மக்கள். ஆனால் உலகின் மோசமான ஆண்கள் சில அங்கு வாழும்.

நான் முட்டாள் இல்லை. நான் ஏன் இந்தியா மற்றும் கலாச்சாரம் பற்றி பேசுகிறேன்? பிரச்சினை இந்திய பண்பாடு அல்ல. பிரச்சனை ஆண்களுக்கு. பிரச்சனை எப்போதும் ஆண்கள் வருகிறது. ஆண்கள் எப்போதும் சிக்கல் இருக்கும். எந்த தமது நாடு.

பெண்கள் ஆண்களுக்கு விடுவித்தாக மற்றும் பிற பெண்களை திருமணம் செய்து கொள்ள முடிவு போது நாம் அனைவரும் மகிழ்ச்சியாக இருப்போம். ஆண்கள் ஒவ்வொரு நாட்டிலும் எங்களை கொடுமை. நாம் பதிலாக பெண்கள் நம் நேரம் செலவிட வேண்டும். ஆனால் ஆணாதிக்க வலுவான எங்கே இடங்களில் உள்ளன. இந்தியா இன்னும் ஒன்றாகும். இந்திய பெண்கள், உன் வலி எனக்கு!

Categories: தமிழ் (Tamil), Foreign Language (Translations), Indian/South Asian, Lesbianism, Patriarchy, Race and Ethnicity, Radical Feminism | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

मुझे यकीन है कि भारतीय महिलाओं मेरे साथ सहमत होगा:

भारतीय पुरुषों के बहुमत गंदगी का घृणित टुकड़े कर रहे हैं और करते रहते हैं या साँस लेने के लायक नहीं है. कुछ अच्छा कर रहे हैं. लेकिन सबसे खराब कर रहे हैं. वे ग्रह पर सबसे बेवकूफ, आलसी, और बुराई पुरुषों रहे हैं. वे वैवाहिक दुरुपयोग के लिए महिलाओं को दोषी ठहराते हैं. वे अपनी सुंदरता के साथ चाल पति की महिलाओं का आरोप लगाते हैं. वे गायों को पूजा लेकिन महिलाओं और बच्चे को लड़कियों को भूखा. उनका मानना ​​है कि महिलाओं को संपत्ति हैं. वे अपनी पत्नियों की हत्या और उनके पैसे ले लो. वे सेक्स के लिए देखने के लिए सड़क पर युवा लड़कियों का पालन करें. वे इंटरनेट पर अमेरिकी महिलाओं के साथ मामलों को करने की कोशिश की है. उनका मानना ​​है कि अमेरिकी और यूरोपीय महिलाओं और उन्हें सेक्स देने की संभावना है.

भारतीय पुरुषों जो मेरे ब्लॉग को पढ़ने के अधिकांश अश्लील साहित्य के लिए खोज रहे थे. वे हिंदी में खोजा. उन्होंने तमिल में खोजा. उन्होंने गुजराती में खोजा. वे बंगाली में खोजा. ये सुंदर भाषा है, दोनों ध्वनि और लेखन. इन पुरुषों भाषा अशुद्ध है. वे इस तरह के “योनि में लिंग के रूप में वाक्यांश के लिए खोज की है,,” गुदा सेक्स “, और” नग्न फिल्में “” लिंग गर्भाशय में प्रवेश करती है “.

मैं भारत के बारे में पढ़ा है. यह एक अच्छा विरासत के साथ एक सुंदर देश है. संगीत अच्छा है. खाना अच्छा है. अच्छा कला. कपड़े अच्छा है. सुंदर लोग. लेकिन दुनिया में सबसे खराब पुरुषों के कुछ वहाँ रहते हैं.

मैं मूर्ख हूँ. मैं भारत और संस्कृति के बारे में क्यों बात कर रहा हूँ? समस्या भारतीय संस्कृति नहीं है. समस्या पुरुषों है. समस्या हमेशा से पुरुषों किया गया है. नर हमेशा समस्या हो जाएगी. कोई फर्क नहीं पड़ता कि क्या उनके देश.

जब महिलाओं को पुरुषों से छुटकारा पाने के लिए और अन्य महिलाओं से शादी करने का फैसला हम सब खुश हो जाएगा. नर हमें हर देश में अन्धेर. हम महिलाओं के साथ हमारे समय के बजाय खर्च करना चाहिए. लेकिन वहाँ स्थानों जहां पितृसत्ता मजबूत है. भारत उनमें से एक है. भारतीय महिलाओं, मैं तुम्हारा दर्द महसूस!

Categories: हिंदी (Hindi), Foreign Language (Translations), Indian/South Asian, Lesbianism, Patriarchy, Race and Ethnicity, Radical Feminism | Tags: , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

મને ખાતરી છે કે ભારતીય મહિલાઓ મને સાથે સંમત થશે છું:

ભારતીય પુરુષો મોટા ભાગના છી ઓફ ઘૃણાસ્પદ ટુકડાઓ હોય છે અને લાયક રહેવા માટે અથવા શ્વાસ નથી. કેટલાક સારા છે. પરંતુ મોટા ભાગના ખરાબ છે. તેઓ પૃથ્વી પર સૌથી લૈંગિકવાદી, મૂર્ખ, સુસ્ત, અને દુષ્ટ પુરુષો છે. તેઓ લગ્ન દુરુપયોગ માટે સ્ત્રીઓ જવાબદાર છે. તેઓ તેમની સુંદરતા સાથે યુક્તિ પતિ મહિલા દોષારોપણ કરે છે. તેઓ ગાય પૂજા પરંતુ દો મહિલાઓ અને કન્યાઓ બાળક ભૂખ્યા. તેઓ માને છે કે સ્ત્રીઓ મિલકત છે. તેઓ તેમના પત્ની ખૂન અને તેમના નાણાં લે છે. તેઓ સેક્સ માટે જુઓ શેરીમાં યુવાન છોકરીઓને અનુસરો. તેઓ ઇન્ટરનેટ પર અમેરિકન સ્ત્રીઓ સાથે બાબતો હોય પ્રયાસ કરો. તેઓ માને છે કે અમેરિકન અને યુરોપીયન મહિલાઓ વધુ તેમને સેક્સ આપી શકે છે.

ભારતીય પુરુષો કે જેઓ મારા બ્લોગ વાંચી છે મોટા ભાગના પોર્નોગ્રાફી માટે શોધ કરવામાં આવી હતી. તેઓ હિન્દી શોધ્યું. તેઓ તમિળ માં શોધાયું. તેઓ ગુજરાતી માં શોધાયું. તેઓ બંગાળી માં શોધાયું. આ સુંદર ભાષાઓ છે, બંને અવાજ અને લેખન. આ પુરુષો તે ભાષાઓ બદનામ છે. તેઓ જેમ કે “યોનિ માં શિશ્ન” તરીકે શબ્દસમૂહો માટે શોધ, “ગુદા મૈથુન”, અને “નગ્ન ચલચિત્રો” “શિશ્ન ગર્ભાશયની પ્રવેશે છે.”

હું ભારત વિશે વાંચ્યું છે. તે એક સારો વારસો સાથે એક સુંદર દેશ છે. સંગીત સારું. સારો ખોરાક. ગુડ કલા. કપડાં સારું. ઉદાર લોકો. પરંતુ વિશ્વમાં સૌથી ખરાબ પુરુષો કેટલાક ત્યાં રહે છે.

હું મૂર્ખ છું. હું ભારત અને સંસ્કૃતિ વિશે કેમ વાત કરી રહ્યો છું? આ સમસ્યા ભારતીય સંસ્કૃતિ નથી. આ સમસ્યા પુરુષો છે. આ સમસ્યા હંમેશા નર રહી છે. નર હંમેશા સમસ્યા હશે. કોઈ બાબત શું તેમના દેશમાં.

જ્યારે સ્ત્રીઓને પુરુષો છૂટકારો મેળવવા અને અન્ય સ્ત્રીઓ સાથે લગ્ન નક્કી અમે બધા ખુશ રહેશે. પુરૂષોની અમને દરેક દેશમાં દમન કરવું. અમે સ્ત્રીઓ સાથે અમારી સમય બદલે ખર્ચવા જ જોઈએ. પરંતુ ત્યાં સ્થાનો જ્યાં પિતૃપ્રધાન સમાજ મજબૂત છે. ભારત તેમાંથી એક છે. ભારતીય મહિલાઓ, હું તમારી પીડા લાગે છે!

Categories: ગુજરાતી (Gujarati), Foreign Language (Translations), Indian/South Asian, Lesbianism, Patriarchy, Race and Ethnicity, Radical Feminism | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

আমি নিশ্চিত ভারতীয় মহিলাদের সম্পর্কে সাথে একমত হবে:

ভারতীয় পুরুষদের অধিকাংশ বিষ্ঠা এর ন্যক্কারজনক টুকরা না করে বা বাস শ্বাস ফেলা না প্রাপ্য. কিছু ভাল. কিন্তু সবচেয়ে খারাপ হয়. তারা গ্রহের সবচেয়ে যৌন বিষয়ক, নির্বোধ, অলস, এবং মন্দ পুরুষদের. তারা বৈবাহিক সেকেন্ড মহিলাদের জন্য দোষারোপ করা. তারা তাদের সৌন্দর্য সঙ্গে কৌতুক স্বামী নারী অভিযুক্ত করা. তারা গরু কিন্তু অর্চনা নারী এবং শিশুর মেয়েরা ক্ষুধায় মারা যাক. তারা বিশ্বাস করেন যে মহিলারা সম্পত্তি. তারা তাদের স্ত্রী এবং তাদের হত্যা টাকা নিতে. তারা রাস্তায় লিঙ্গের জন্য সন্ধান অল্পবয়সী মেয়েরা অনুসরণ করুন. তারা ইন্টারনেট আমেরিকান নারীদের সঙ্গে ব্যাপার আছে চেষ্টা করুন. তারা বিশ্বাস করে আমেরিকান এবং ইওরোপীয় মহিলারা আরো তাদের লিঙ্গের দেওয়ার সম্ভাবনা থাকে.

ভারতীয় পুরুষ পাখী যারা আমার ব্লগ পড়ে অধিকাংশ পর্নোগ্রাফি অনুসন্ধানের জন্য ছিল. তারা হিন্দি মধ্যে অনুসন্ধান করা. তারা তামিল মধ্যে অনুসন্ধান করা. তারা গুজরাটি মধ্যে অনুসন্ধান করা. তারা বাঙ্গালী মধ্যে অনুসন্ধান করা. এগুলি সুন্দর ভাষা, শব্দ এবং উভয় লেখা. এই পুরুষদের ভাষা আছে মলিন. তারা যেমন “যোনি মধ্যে লিঙ্গ” বাক্যাংশ অনুসন্ধান, “লিঙ্গ প্রবেশ জরায়ু”, “মলদ্বারে যৌনমিলন”, এবং “উলঙ্গ সিনেমা”.

আমি ইন্ডিয়া সম্পর্কে পড়েছি. এটি একটি ভাল ঐতিহ্যের সঙ্গে সুন্দর দেশ. ভালো সঙ্গীত. ভালো খাবার. গুড শিল্প. গুড পোশাক. সুদর্শন মানুষ. কিন্তু বিশ্বের সবচেয়ে খারাপ পুরুষদের কিছু সেখানে বসবাস.

আমি মূঢ়. আমি এটা কেন ইন্ডিয়া এবং সংস্কৃতি সম্পর্কে বলছেন? সমস্যা ভারতীয় সংস্কৃতি নয়. সমস্যা হলো পুরুষদের. সমস্যা সবসময়ই পুরুষদের. পুরুষদের সবসময় সমস্যা হবে. কোন ব্যাপার কি তাদের দেশ.

যখন মহিলারা পুরুষদের থেকে পরিত্রাণ পেতে এবং নারী বিবাহ করা অন্যান্য সমস্ত সিদ্ধান্ত আমরা সুখী হতে হবে. পুরুষদের প্রতি জুলুম করা আমাদের দেশে. আমরা নারীদের সঙ্গে পরিবর্তে আমাদের সময় ব্যয় করতে হবে. কিন্তু জায়গা যেখানে পিতৃতন্ত্র হয় মজবুত আছে. ভারত তাদের একজন. ভারতীয় নারী, আমি আপনার ব্যথা অনুভব!

Categories: বাংলা (Bengali), Foreign Language (Translations), Indian/South Asian, Lesbianism, Patriarchy, Pragmatic Activism, Radical Feminism | Tags: , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment













*宗教說,女性不如男性。他們也說,上帝希望婦女服從男子。因為沒有人可以看到或聽到上帝的聲音,使得可以假裝神說什麼,他們希望他說的話。 (也許上帝是不是一個“他”也許這是一個“她”!)





“我們的文化不能改變它的傳統。”這是愚蠢的。如果奴隸或謀殺是一個社會的傳統?人們應該繼續殺人和自己的奴隸? “婦女必須服從,因為這是傳統。”這是邪惡的。






Categories: Foreign Language (Translations), Patriarchy, Radical Feminism, 中國(傳統) (Chinese- Traditional) | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

És un parany.


El matrimoni és una trampa.
Els nadons i el part és una trampa.
La monogàmia és un parany.
La heterosexualitat és una trampa.
La religió és un parany.
“L’amor” és un parany.
El patriarcat és un parany.
L’obediència és un parany.
La tradició és una trampa.
El capitalisme és un parany.
La societat i la cultura són un parany.

Les dones en totes les cultures es troben atrapats pel patriarcat.

Trampes de matrimoni les dones per tenir a una dona enganxada a un sol home. Ha de servir i obeir en la majoria de les cultures. Ella és una esclava. Ella no pot aconseguir un marit diferent si ella està sent abusat.

Les dones que prenen la cura dels nadons no tenen temps per treballar o gaudir de les seves vides. Les dones que tenen nadons han de tenir cura d’ells i no pot sortir de casa o el marit. Una dona pot afavorir el seu fill sobre altres dones. És, per tant enganxat al gènere masculí. Donar a llum massa sovint fa que les dones tan cansat que no pot escapar d’un mal marit o netejar la casa. Hi ha massa gent al món. Donar a llum fa que el superpoblat món.

La monogàmia significa que una persona només pot tenir un dels cònjuges. Ells normalment no es permet que el cònjuge a divorciar-se. Això significa que si una dona està casada amb un home dolent, no pot desfer-se’n. Si cada persona se li permet tenir un cònjuge, els homes que són dolents, mandrosos, egoistes o pot ser amo d’una esposa. Si la monogàmia va ser abolida, les dones serien capaços de compartir els pocs homes bons en una societat. Se’ls permet fer cas omís dels dolents.

La heterosexualitat obliga les dones a casar-se amb homes en lloc de les dones. Però la majoria dels homes són egoistes, sexista, mandrós, i tirànic. Si les dones se’ls permetia casar-se amb altres dones tindríem matrimonis més feliços. Algunes dones que tenen relacions sexuals amb homes de quedar embarassada i després desfer-se dels homes. Això és el que la majoria dels homes fan a la majoria de les dones.

La majoria de les religions creuen que les dones són inferiors als homes. Li diuen a les dones a obeir els seus marits i tenir fills. Diuen que les dones som pecadors i que els seus cossos estan bruts. Quan la religió és controlada pels homes, que beneficia els homes. La majoria de les religions dir a la gent a acceptar les coses dolentes que els succeeixen. Els homes fan coses dolentes a les dones i dir-los a les dones de Déu serà feliç si les dones accepten l’abús.

Les persones diuen a les dones que si estimen a un home que serà feliç. Li diuen a les dones que si estimen a un home, ell la tractarà amb amabilitat. Diuen que si una dona estima a un home, ella no li importarà que el seu mal comportament. Llibres i pel · lícules i cançons s’han escrit sobre el “amor”, el romanç i el matrimoni. Ells tracten de rentar el cervell de les dones als homes es casen.

El patriarcat és el sistema mundial de dret, la religió, govern, economia, medicina, i la cultura que els homes es beneficien. Llei de treball, la religió, els diners, el govern, els metges, i la cultura en conjunt per beneficiar els homes i per controlar les dones.

* En molts països, les lleis beneficien els homes només. Si un home i una dona cometre el mateix crim, l’home és castigat menys. De vegades, la llei obliga les dones a acceptar menys diners per treballar en la mateixa feina que un home. En alguns països, com Aràbia Saudita, les dones no se’ls permet conduir automòbils.

* Les religions diuen que les dones són inferiors als homes. També diuen que Déu vol que les dones a obeir als homes. Com que ningú no pot veure ni sentir a Déu, fa que es pot pretendre que Déu va dir tot el que vulguin que digui. (Potser Déu no és un “ell”. Potser és una “ella”!)

* Els governs castiguen les dones que no obeeixen les regles injustes. Són similars als de les famílies patriarcals del dictador a la part superior, els camperols (nens i dones) a la part inferior. Ells han d’obeir el pare o dictador.

* Els metges fan que les dones prenen els mateixos medicaments que els homes tot i que els seus cossos són sovint diferents. Això fa que la dona malalta. Metges de sexe masculí controlar i regular la natalitat, perquè tenen por del poder de les dones a donar a llum. Naixements no naturals causar dolor per a les dones. Els psicòlegs diagnosticar les dones com “boig” quan s’atreveixen a parlar contra el patriarcat. Les dones que són agredides pels seus marits són diagnosticats com “histèrica”.

* Les pel · lícules i llibres retraten a la dona com la depressió, si no volen tenir un marit. Estils de les dones usen roba que sigui difícil per a les dones es mouen i respiren. Art retrata les dones com febles i submisos. Revistes dir-los a les dones que ha de ser bella per ser estimats per la societat.

“La bona dona és obedient,” la majoria de les societats de dir. Això no és cert. Ells estan tractant d’enganyar les dones a convertir-se en esclaves dels homes. L’obediència no és mai una bona cosa. Si obeeixes algú incondicionalment, que farà el mal si et comandament.

“La nostra cultura no ha de canviar les seves tradicions.” Això és estúpid. Què passa si l’esclavitud o l’assassinat era la tradició d’una societat? Si les persones es matin les persones i els esclaus propis? “Les dones han d’obeir perquè és la tradició.” Aquest és el mal.

El capitalisme fa que els rics més rics. Fa que la gent pobre més pobre. La majoria dels rics són homes. La majoria de les dones són pobres. El capitalisme permet als homes rics per prendre els diners de les dones pobres.

La societat fa que les dones solteres se senten avergonyits. La societat fa que les dones lletges se senten avergonyits. Moltes cultures diuen a les dones que es deprimeixen si no s’ajusten.

Si volem alliberar les dones, hem de lluitar contra tot això. No deixeu que el patriarcat que oprimeixen!


Aquest article es va traduir a molts idiomes diferents.

Categories: Català (Catalan), Foreign Language (Translations), Patriarchy, Radical Feminism | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Create a free website or blog at