Things I’ve Noticed About Patriarchy and its Sicknesses

-Women are called “sensitive” by men because men don’t want to admit their horrific behavior towards women causes women to be unhappy.

-Many men want to liberate women for the same reason monkeys want to liberate bananas from trees.  

– Racism suddenly becomes unfashionable when men find out they can bond with men of other races to the detriment of women. 

-The “right” to have sex means an underclass of people is obligated to provide it. 

-If prostitution is liberating, why aren’t half of prostitutes men? You get money for having sex. Men are supposed to like sex and they’re supposed to like money. Come on, guys! Deal breaker!

-Men trade their humanity for acceptance into the boys’ club. If turned away, they demand-still soulless and soiled with the mud they chose to roll in- that women let them back into the Eden they cast themselves out of. When women shut the door, they are called the Devil and Eden Hell. 

-Marriage and pregnancy are the ball and chain patriarchy uses to keep women imprisoned. Men are drafted to act as the jailers. Men who refuse are traitors. 

-The unwillingness to subjugate women gets a man kicked out of the boys’ club. This includes unwillingness to lie to women about men and men’s abilities, especially their genitals and their genitals’ abilities.

-The Rock and Roll movement, especially the late 60s and early 70s genres, promoted bestial sexuality, dark and esoteric occultism, and lack of structure, responsibility, and safety in favor of Dionysian “values,” which overwhelmingly benefit rapists and not women.

-Why are a surprising amount of gay men misogynistic? It’s obvious. Gay men are still men. It’s patriarchy, not hetero-archy.

-Many men don’t really like PIV- or any type of sex, for that matter. They like the feeling of phallically conquering something, perhaps including, as secondary benefit, exotic physical sensations to flavor the process.

-Emmett Till was the black victim of a ghastly beating and unjust murder which were undertaken against him because he whistled in a sexual manner at a white woman…but has anyone stopped to think why it took the murder of a sexual harasser to stir white men’s anger?

-At least men used to be cultured. Then women gained access to literature, philosophy, and the arts, and men suddenly didn’t want to play with those anymore. 

-The male dominated libertarian revolutions care about freedom all right: the freedom to do whatever they want…which coincidentally happens to be problematic and oppressive toward women, black people, gays, Native Americans, etc.

-Do men ever get pressured to go to the doctor’s for erection check ups, or ejaculation control, or napkins for semen “protection”? Why aren’t men hounded to visit an andrologist from age 16 on? Is it, perchance, that the penis is considered perfect?

-The lesbian and gay movements have a vastly different underlying motive. Lesbians are fighting to end social oppression and intolerance; the gay movement is fighting a cock block. 

-The great catch-22: Are masculized men homoerotic because they love men or because they hate women?

-In the French Revolution the theme was “Liberty, equality, and fraternity,” and the word fraternity is very heavily one of male bonding. Liberty for men from feminine like responsibilities and ties, equality (to predicate bonding) among all males, and fraternity meaning loyalty to men of all creeds and classes and to the cause of above said virtues, which included smashing anything “feminine” that (oppressive or not) at least promoted responsibility and sociality. 

-Male dominated societies always call menstrual blood “dirty”. But notice their attitude towards other bodily fluids- diarrhea, vomit, semen, spit, bile, earwax, pimple pus- they never consider those substances uniquely disgusting. Only the things men cannot produce are considered inhumanly dirty. 

-Marriage is a trap.

Babies and giving birth is a trap.

Monogamy is a trap.

Heterosexuality is a trap.

Religion is a trap.

“Love” is a trap.

Patriarchy is a trap.

Obedience is a trap.

Tradition is a trap.

Capitalism is a trap.

Society and culture are a trap.

Women in all cultures are trapped by patriarchy.

-The act of classifying sexuality as hetero or homo is based on a frame that appeals to masculine ideals (as defined by patriarchy): you love or are attracted to people based on their genitals. It’s a very genital-oriented view of attraction. “Do you like cock or cunt?”

-Men, in general at least, have underlying homoerotic and phallophilic desires. Yet because of heterosexual edicts a man can’t come out and ask other men for sex. Men, as a class, must therefore wordlessly agree to establish a situation in which homosexual behavior or at least titillation is unavoidable: the locker room. 

Although most men have underlying homoerotic tendencies, no man may ask outright for homosexual contact. A request stems from desire; desire signifies need; need signifies weakness, since, in men’s minds, need means ability to be manipulated via that need, and said manipulation could mean the needy individual being forced, if he is desperate enough, to accept being penetrated- being made a woman. 

Therefore, communal male nudity must be ritualized, normalized, ordained from above, expected, forced by circumstance or tradition, and thrust upon men, who would otherwise have to request it and risk being branded as “needy” and hence wiling to take a subordinate role. 

Communal nudity also establishes generic male bonding and allows men to simultaneously perceive the differences among men (underscoring their supposed individuality) and, on a peculiar flip side of this coin, giving them false ideas about “a normal man’s body” (false due to the fact that many men, particularly those with “inadequate” genitals or abilities, do not use locker rooms). Men use this supposedly accurate knowledge about “normal men’s bodies” (and the access to knowledge about all male genitals, behaviors, and personalities the locker room supposedly gives them) to tell women what men are. This is usually lacking in any mention of male inabilities or physical/psychological/behavioral similarities to women. Women cannot know about men who eschew masculinity or who are physically not oppressor material. 

Categories: Articles In English, Femininity, Gender, History and Political, Homosexuality/LGBT, Liberty Doods, Male Bonding, Masculinity, Patriarchy, PIV, Porn/Prostitution, Race and Ethnicity, Radical Feminism, Sex | Tags: , , , | 6 Comments

Why My Site’s 2dn Highest # of Visitors Is From India

The largest number of visitors to my blog is from the Unites States.  The second highest number is from India.  I do have some blog posts in four different Indian languages: Hindi, Bengali, Tamil, and Gujarati.  India is a highly populated country.  Do these things explain fully why so many visitors from India come to my blog, as opposed to, say, the UK, or Germany (I have articles in German as well)?

Personally, I think the reason so many Indian users visit my blog is because they believe it is about sex.  India is one of those countries in which men are “sex starved”.  Because, you know, sex is like food.   If you don’t have it, you die.  In India, sex is more taboo than in the Western World, and men “need” to visit online sites in order to “get” sex.

How do I know they are searching my site for sex?  Because of the key words- lovely exotic Indian languages, reminiscent of a rajah dressed in rich robes, his red-jeweled headpiece bedazzled by the late afternoon Delhi sun, putting a golden quill to a paper and swirling a voluptuous word onto the delicate page, indecipherable to the eyes of uncultured Western adventurers: “Vagina,” “sex films,” “penis in anus,” “naked movies.”

Gorgeous.  India is a rich culture with a strong history and a tradition in which women were often honored.  Indian men, please act like it, or leave my blog.  Otherwise, I’m kind of happy you waste five minutes of your time on a radical feminist blog.  Perhaps it will take some time out from your quest to quench your so -called “sex-starvedness.”

Categories: Articles In English, Indian/South Asian, Porn/Prostitution, Race and Ethnicity, Radical Feminism, Sex | Tags: , , , , , | 2 Comments

Brice Taylor’s “Thanks For the Memories” and the Reality Behind America’s Beloved Male Celebrities

Wow. I just finished skimming through Brice Taylor’s “Thanks for the Memories”.  Although I skimmed, not read, I got enough information to have my eyes opened to the reality of celebrity life in the United States, and perhaps worldwide. Her memoir, satirically referencing Bob Hope, who handled her as his personal sex toy, deals with the very real problem of powerful group’s of men trying to take over the world. This is nothing new to world history. This is always how things have worked, or should we say, have not worked (because how can you call war, genocide, slavery “working”)?

Brice refers to an international ring of sex slaves owned by many powerful celebrities and world leaders. She was personally owned by Bob Hope, the comedian. (You know, the totally unfunny one from the 1940s- like there’s only one of those)!  Implicated in her book are people such as John F. Kennedy, Henry Kissinger, Sylvester Stallone, Bill and Hillary Clinton, Gerald Ford, LBJ, Ted Kennedy (surprise, surprise), Prince Philip, Mickey Rooney, and many others, including her own father, who once buried her under the house in a coffin. Many victims or quasi-victims (some people, although abusers, were brainwashed into it) are also listed, such as Barbra Streisand, Elvis Presley, and Princess Diana. She talks much about the elite groups such as the illuminati, and the Manchurian agenda, and how groups of famous men from all over the world meet to share prostitutes and slaves.  Kissinger, although not using her for sex, used her as his personal computer, and therefore, she has a high level of knowledge about how the government and world powers of the world work.

In addition to being sexually abused and tortured, Brice had one baby tortured in front of her, and another baby stolen to be groomed to marry into the monarchy in Britain. This is how the world has worked since day one.  If you’re surprised, check your premises.  Brice is a Christian now and draws the conclusion that these people are Satanists and are trying to have Satanism control the world.  Not so hard to believe. After all, Christianity itself, when under control of evil people at least, try to do the same thing. Men, or at least the majority of men, have that uncanny ability to twist something around and fuck it up, literally.  Although many Satanists and witches have been pro-female, the same thing can happen with that thought system.  It’s easy to twist any thought system, or religion, for one’s purposes.

It’s easy to see why many branches of Satanism are harmful to women. They preach open sexuality, doing whatever you want, and they emphasize getting to know the dark side of your nature. Of course, these can be twisted in a good way as well, and many Satanists are feminists or at least do not abuse women. So it really depends on the Satanists you happen to meet, or the particular branch, rather than the nature of the philosophy, since we know already that all philosophies can be twisted to hate women. Even feminism. (See Hugo Schweizer).  Still, there is a lot of ample evidence to suggest that there is Satanists who are trying to achieve world power, a new influence a lot of the world’s governments, just as Christianity, in whatever form, influenced a lot of world governments 500 years ago. I’m a history major, if you want to come at me with some kind of a “stupid conspiracy theories” argument, I’m damn ready.  😀

Needless to say, this book carries an extremely strong trigger warning.  Brice was severely sexually abused, sometimes tortured, emotionally manipulated, had hypnotism used on her to create obedience, and out of the strategy of self protection she developed multiple personalities (à la Sybil).  Many doctors do not want to treat her, because they were afraid to get sued or put out of business, or even hurt, by the elites she wanted to point fingers at.  It also carries a trigger warning for those who are afraid to see their favorite celebrities implicated in a horrifying sex, rape, slavery, and murderous lifestyle.  Then again, tp people sensitive to that kind of trigger, I kind of want to say “get the fuck used to it.”

Is it so hard to believe that a man, or group of men, from the 1940s era, the era in which women were called dames and broads, would go a little further and personally own sex slaves? Is it so hard to believe that just because somebody is famous and powerful, and the media, which they probably help control, calls them beloved, it’s impossible for them to do heinous things?  It is so hard to believe that a world leader would do such things? If Adolf Hitler owned sex slaves, we’d be sure to hear about it, and we’d say “oh yeah, of course!”  So why is it so hard to believe that our presidents and world leaders could have sex slaves as well?  Is it so hard to believe that there is a very elite, highly powerful group of men who sell, train, and abuse women and children for their own purposes?  Why?  What else have they been doing for the entire course of human history?

Unfortunately, if you check the reviews, a lot of people claim she is a liar even though the book seems to have gotten mostly positive reviews.  How do they know?  Why is it always that the potential victim is presumed to be a liar?  Yes, some (very few) people fabricate rape or other charges, but the percentages are so low, and the circumstances (a world with slavery, patriarchy, “right to sex”, and sex slavery) so indicative that even these people have some motive, that it becomes dangerous to assume any possible victim is lying, until judiciously proved otherwise.  Do they not want to see their favorite celebrities implicated on Are they just being careful not to throw themselves into what they see as another conspiracy theory?  Or are they just on there to write one star reviews, like a lot of people do, just for fun?  Are they being paid by the people who own these sex rings?  Who knows?

Although I listed her book here from a free site, I would like us to buy the book from her, if possible, to show us that we stand with her, and because, after being handled by men, as we all know, the psychiatric bills must be astronomical!   Also, I think we need to stand with her and help her expose these elites and torturers for the entire world to see.  At least, the half of the world we trust.

Categories: Articles In English, emotional, Famous, Pedophilia, Porn/Prostitution, Radical Feminism, Rape and Harrassment, Sex, Violence and Abuse | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Visiting Prostitutes is Degrading…For the John?

Basic summary:

-A woman friend of mine took me to them, so I’m not as responsible!
-It was scary and intimidating, especially when they made the girls line up…it was scary for ME!
-It was humiliating FOR ME because she inspected me for disease (even though I could leave anytime)
-I was happy afterwards so it’s not degrading, herp a derp!
-Some brothels don’t treat prostitutes badly, so it’s OK!! they didn’t feel victimized.
-Your male relative might visit a prostitute in the future, so let’s make sure johns’ behavior is normalized!
-We need to condemn people who take advantage of women forced into it, but that’s not all prostitutes!

John* is a writer by trade, a frustrated rock star in his spare time, a social media junkie, and a committed atheist.” [how did i guess?  walking talking stereotype]


To be fair, I do think it’s possible for a person to choose sex work as a valid choice, but it’s just too damn hard to tell whether a particular woman did or did not make a meaningful choice when she’s living under a patriarchy.  Still, my guess is that sex work jobs that are done by those who legitimately choose to do it would still be low in number, even without a patriarchy.

And as much as I want to think he’s a nice guy, this “John” fellow smacks of being an apologist for all sorts of things.



*well, if the name fits!

Categories: Articles In English, Porn/Prostitution, Radical Feminism, Sex | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Why it is Permissible to Steal and Burn Porn Paraphernalia



In the nation of America, we tend to have this idea that if you leave human beings alone, they will naturally do what is right.  While this is the case (speaking of normal, natural humans, at least), it is not true of those living in the modern Western world.


While “leave it be” might have worked in some naturalistic, communal, nature-loving, fair, just, tolerant society, it does not work when the people you are “leaving be” (giving freedom from government) are not this sort of good person.  It doesn’t work with people who are selfish, greedy, materialistic, patriarchal, and nature-hating.  “Leave it be”, libertarianism, anarchism, and the like philosophies only work when the people you are liberating can handle that liberty in an adult manner.

Likewise, we also have this idea in America that if a law or rule is in place, there’s probably a good reason for it, and that therefore we must obey it.  The idea is that the most important thing is to follow the law, because that ostensibly protects people’s liberty, and it’s more important to adhere to the books’ idea of fairness than to act outside of the law, even if our actions outside of the law are more fair than the laws on the books.

For example, the law says we cannot steal and burn pornographic magazines, because that would be damaging property and interfering with the store owner’s and the publisher’s right to make money.  But the harm done to the women and girls in the porn magazine (who are often forced to pose) and the harm done to the sex slaves whose jailers and underground prisons are paid for by the sales of the porn is objectively greater.

However, since a few pieces of paper that say we cannot put a physical, forced stop to this travesty because that would interfere with the “system” and “mess up” the social and legal structure and cause chaos……we must let these girls continue to be enslaved?



I believe if someone is being hurt, wronged, or tortured, then books be damned. 



I believe if you know something is wrong, and the law doesn’t, then you have the responsibility to step in.  More harm will be caused by the evil than by the “chaos” that would ensue should the rule or law be broken (in order to stop the evil).  If you see a man beating up a 2 year old child across the tracks, and the law says you cannot cross the tracks, what will cause more harm?  Allowing the beating, or simply crossing the tracks?

Much of the money used in porn magazines and porn sites and porn videos goes to the underground sex service industry, where young girls from all over the world are often caught and forced to work in the sex industry.  It is known as the “white slave trade” because many white and Eastern European women are trafficked in it.  We don’t hear much about it except from feminist blogs and from parents (in reaction to some such young teen on the news who “disappears” now and then while on vacation).

Even the women who aren’t living in cages overseas in some sex slavery ring are still being tortured by the patriarchal product of pornography.  Pornography serves as a manual for harming women- much as a Nazi manual serves the same purpose for harming Jews. Every time a man sees a woman in an animal pose being raped in a foldout in one of those magazines, he is being encouraged to treat women in the same way.  In addition, many of the women who are posing are forced or tricked into it.  Even if they do so of their own accord, it is still difficult to determine whether they truly made the choice to do so out of their own desire or out of the desires of patriarchy, which are possibly influencing them.  (only in a society free of sexism and other bigotry could we truly know what each and every individual really desires to do, and what they truly chose to do without outside influence).

Why would it be so wrong to sneak into a few porn stores, carry off a bunch of material, and set fire to it?  Or better yet, burn our own radical feminist content over the DVDs and recycle the magazines to make paper to write our books and pamphlets on?



Who would it really hurt?



It would save a couple of lives, ranging from the woman raped on the street because her rapist read porn, a woman forced to pose for porn photos for any number of reasons, a woman forced to starve because she lost her job to a Playboy bunny type, or even a woman who was snatched off the streets in the Ukraine because some pimp was paid extra for his visit with money that came directly from the profits of the porn magazines.

In addition, if we snuck into their stores and used their crap as blank slates to burn or write our messages over, we could have a free supply of helpful and educational DVDs and pamphlets to give to high school girls and battered women across the country.



Would it really be that bad?

Categories: Articles In English, Extralegal, Porn/Prostitution, Pragmatic Activism, Radical Feminism, Sex | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , | 6 Comments

What is Radical Feminism?

Radical feminism is a form of feminism which believes patriarchy needs to be dismantled, and that women cannot work inside its system to be free.  Patriarchy is the system some men have put in place for the benefit of all men, and it includes the legal system, medical system, media, and religions.


Radical feminism does not believe patriarchy hurts men as much as it hurts women, just as racism didn’t hurt whites as much as blacks.  That’s why it’s called bigotry- because it’s unfair.  That’s the point.  It’s not about achieving equality with men under the current system (which is patriarchy and is SET UP so men win).  It’s about dismantling it and preserving the happiness of innocent people.   This is why “equality” never works, because misogynistic men’s intent is not to rig the game to get more money, power, etc, and then they’ll be happy, but to attack women; the system is just a tool of that intent.  “Equality” never works because it’s a war, not a race.


I want to suggest to you that a commitment to sexual equality with males, that is, to uniform character as of motion or surface, is a commitment to becoming the rich instead of the poor, the rapist instead of the raped, the murderer instead of the murdered.  I want to ask you to make a different commitment – a commitment to the abolition of poverty, rape and murder; that is, a commitment to ending the system of oppression called patriarchy; to ending the male sexual model itself.”
-Andrea Dworkin “Our Blood”.

In other words, neither men nor women should obey the system.




Radical feminism doesn’t believe bad men “don’t know better”, “suffer under” their own bigotry, or “need to be educated”.  It believes misogynists know exactly what they’re doing when they hurt or discriminate against women and that they use our idiocy (our willingness to think they don’t know any better) to get away with it.   Does a man who kicks his wife because she won’t have sex with him really need to be “educated”, or do you think he already knows kicking ANY person is wrong?  Bullies in any corner of society know exactly what harm they’re doing, and this is why they do it.   The point is to hurt.



Radical feminism doesn’t believe PIV (penis-inside-vagina) sex is the only way to have sex, or that it should be the default definition of “sex”.  PIV sex is male centric, since during PIV the penis often gets more pleasure than the clitoris (though everyone is an individual and we all have differences among our bodies).  PIV is not necessary for pregnancy, which can be caused by sperm swimming up the vagina from being deposited on the outside (and pregnancy is not the only reason for sex).  The media, doctors, gynecologists, and art portray PIV as the most natural and normal type of sex because it is usually more pleasurable for men, and try to “fix” women who don’t like it (“vaginismus”, etc).
PIV can cause cervical cancer, dryness, soreness, and pain.  It’s the kind of activity that is best done in moderation, if at all.  PIV- the act itself- is more likely to cause pain for the woman than for the man.  Patriarchy, therefore, supports PIV as the “normal” way to have sex, and theorizes that women are the “weaker” and more vulnerable sex because they can be more easily hurt by intercourse than men.  But suppose a woman slammed her clitoris and labia against a man’s testicles- that would hurt.  Yet we don’t hear society calling that act “normal” sex, because the man would be getting hurt in that case.
PIV is often used by domineering or misogynistic men to get women to bond with them- such close contact creates feelings, and if the intercourse is harsh enough, she may have a mild sort of “trauma bond” with the male.  Since society and the media tell women giving men PIV is something that should “liberate” them, or that they should get used to if they want a “normal sex life”, society/the media acts like a sexual predator, coercing women into doing things they might otherwise not want to.


Sex-positivism is the idea that having more sex and more kinds of sex is the key to liberation, especially having more sex with men.  It’s not.  What’s liberating about having sex with men?  We’re already expected to do that!  What’s revolutionary about BDSM or sadomasochism?  There’s always been an undercurrent of that in society (sometimes it becomes more mainstream than at other times), and isn’t sex the way masculinity and patriarchy conceive of it already painful and violent?  “Liberating” events like SlutWalk make good points, such as women who are sexually active should not be judged more than men.  But the movements fail to address whether sexual liberation is good for women or not.  For example, surely a woman has as much right to cut herself on the arm as men do, and not be judged for it…but is it good for her to do so?  No.


Liberal feminism thinks the way to free women is to teach them to act the way patriarchal or “masculine” men act.  For example, to dominate others, to give up everyday life in search of happiness in the business world, to be less in tune with their bodies and minds, etc.  It’s the equivalent of telling black people in 1840 that the key to being free is to enslave others and start their own plantation.  We don’t want expedient, materialistic success; we want to be treated and thought of as human beings.  Liberal feminism also has a “pick your battles” attitude about the women’s movement, often calling some issue “too small” or “non-issues”, which is a tactic the patriarchy uses to silence complaints.  Who’s to decide which issues are “too small”?  If someone’s bothered by something, it needs to be addressed!
Liberal feminism believes men who hate women truly don’t know what they’re doing and if we just pick up a textbook and a dictionary and educate them, they’ll say, “Oh, okay.  I never realized that before!  I’ll stop using women as sperm dumpsters.”  Men already know women don’t like to be treated like shit, and that it’s wrong to treat someone a certain way because of something other than their personal characteristics.  The horrible things they do to women are things they know are wrong to do to everybody, like lying, insulting, victim-blaming, and assaulting. We’re supposed to believe men know it’s wrong to do those things to 100% of people, then suddenly forget that it’s wrong to do them to some people five minutes later.  Sorry.  Not buying it.
The solution liberal feminists have to the patriarchy problem is for women to find individual happiness or escape from it as individuals- i.e., if a woman happens to be lucky enough to become a big CEO, then feminism is a success, even though her sisters are still suffering.  “Individualism” is prized, instead of group politics, even though it is a group, as a group, that is suffering, not random individuals who just happen to be female.

We believe women should try to be as independent from men as possible, emotionally, financially, and otherwise.  Though there are definitely some good men, the majority of men on the planet (counting third world countries and places like Saudi Arabia) are bigoted and even dangerous.  Women should try to build up friendships and even romantic partnerships with other women as a precautionary measure, since men are taught to lie to and emotionally manipulate women to get what they want.  Women should partner with men only if the particular man is suitable, and should not search specifically for a male partner, because bad men prey on this automatic assurance that women will bond with men as a group, because they’re men.  We need to stop feeding the “a girl for every boy!” machine.

Forced monogamy is part of the problem.  If heterosexual women had the choice of sharing the few good men instead of settling for the bad ones (so each and every man, no matter how horrible, got a wife) a lot of our problems would be solved.  Why breed a bad man’s child?  It would also be better if women were not expected to marry to get societal benefits.

We oppose the “who am I to judge” attitude about bad male behavior such as objectifying women and watching pornography, and we have put forth the radical idea that prostitution and pornography are not ways to liberate women.  Current pornography, since it is 99% comprised of violence or domination against women, and since it is used as a manual to train young boys to hate and rape women, should be banned.  Pornography is not “just a choice” for either the viewer or the person in the photos.  Often, the girls used in the photos were coerced or were spied on, and the fact that they’re smiling means nothing, since they are only acting.  Often, actual rapes are filmed, and passed off as “acting”.  The user does not deserve any respect since they are viewing the other’s body as an object, and since they’re getting off from hatred and domination.  Only in a healthy society can erotica (NOT pornography) or other sexualized arts exist, a society free from misogyny and domination as a mainstream form of sex.
Prostitution must be criminalized for customers and decriminalized for prostituted women.  Prostitution is not just a job like any other.  Most people in the profession want to leave, but are forced to stay because their pimps threaten them with violence, because they are poor and hungry, or because they were kidnapped and placed in the business against their will.  The only difference between prostitution and rape is that the coercion part of it was done by the pimp or the woman’s circumstances, instead of by the man himself.  Sweden has criminalized prostitution for customers (johns) instead of the prostitutes themselves and has had great success.

The cowardly “all-inclusiveness” in the feminist movement must end immediately. We include those who support our goals. We do not include those who oppose our goals. Such would be including a Hitler Youth organizer in a Jewish rights march.  The reason we have a name for our movement is because we disagree with some beliefs and support others.  We also are not obligated to respect views opposing ours.  We do not respect Wahabbi Islam, religious right-wing nutjobs, the guy at the local Macy’s who calls women “bitches”, rapists who also happen to be good filmmakers, or the Pope.


Radical feminism is not afraid to fight the good fight, break some rules, and ruffle some feathers, because a few offended misogynists are worth our rights.  We are not “good girls” and we’re not dedicated to wasting our time “talking it out” and “educating” people who are opposed to us anymore than we would try to reason with the aggressor in any other war.  We will establish a world in which women are equal to men, in which men don’t prey on women, in which the media doesn’t make women feel ugly and inferior, and in which marriage and monogamy no longer trap women into men’s lives.




In other words, we will establish a world in which women are free from patriarchy and control by men.

Categories: Articles In English, As Opposed to Liberal Feminism, Conservatism/Liberalism, Lesbianism, Marriage/Monogamy, Patriarchy, PIV, Porn/Prostitution, Pragmatic Activism, Radical Feminism, Separatism, Sex | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Create a free website or blog at