Posts Tagged With: protest

Pussy Riot va fi închis timp de doi ani

(folosiţi Google Translate # ro / AF /)


Acest lucru este inacceptabil.

Dracu ‘guvernul rus.

Dracu ‘Vladimir Putin.

Dracu ‘de procurori.

La naiba cu persecutorii.

Dracu ‘biserica.

Dracu ‘patriarhat.


Elibera Pussy Riot!

Acum, protestele sunt doar începutul …

Categories: Foreign Language (Translations), Patriarchy, Politics and Current Events, Radical Feminism, Religion and Spirituality, Română (Romanian), Silencing Women | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Pussy Riot zostanie skazany na dwa lata

(użyj Google Translate # pl / af /)


Jest to niedopuszczalne.

Pieprzyć rząd rosyjski.

Pieprzyć Władimira Putina.

Pieprzyć prokuratorów.

Pieprzyć prześladowców.

Pieprzyć kościół.

Pieprzyć patriarchat.


Wyzwolić Pussy Riot!

Teraz protesty dopiero zaczynają …

Categories: Foreign Language (Translations), Patriarchy, Politics and Current Events, Radical Feminism, Religion and Spirituality, Silencing Women | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Pussy Riot vil bli fengslet i to år

(bruk Google Oversett # no / AF /)


Dette er uakseptabelt.

Faen ta den russiske regjeringen.

Faen Vladimir Putin.

Faen påtalemyndighetene.

Faen forfølgerne.

Faen kirken.

Faen patriarkatet.


Frigjøre “Pussy Riot”!

Nå protestene er bare begynnelsen …

Categories: Foreign Language (Translations), Norsk (Norwegian), Patriarchy, Politics and Current Events, Radical Feminism, Religion and Spirituality, Silencing Women | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Pussy Riot werden für zwei Jahre ins Gefängnis kommen

(verwenden Sie Google Translate # en / af /)


Das ist inakzeptabel.

Scheiß auf die russische Regierung.

Fick Wladimir Putin.

Scheiß auf die Staatsanwälte.

Scheiß auf die Verfolger.

Scheiß auf die Kirche.

Fick Patriarchat.


Liberate “Pussy Riot”!

Jetzt sind die Proteste sind erst am Anfang …

Categories: Deutsch, Foreign Language (Translations), Patriarchy, Politics and Current Events, Radical Feminism, Religion and Spirituality, Silencing Women | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Pussy Riot on vangistati kaks aastat

(kasuta Google Tõlgi # en / af /)


See on lubamatu.

Kurat Venemaa valitsus.

Kurat Vladimir Putin.

Kurat prokurörid.

Kurat tagakiusajate.

Kurat kirikus.

Kurat patriarhaat.


Vabastada “Pussy Riot”!

Nüüd protestid on ainult algus …

Categories: Eesti (Estonian), Foreign Language (Translations), Patriarchy, Politics and Current Events, Radical Feminism, Religion and Spirituality, Silencing Women | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Pussy Riot will Be gevangen gezet twee jaar

(gebruik Google Translate # nl / AF /)


Dit is aanvaardbaar.

Neuk de Russische regering.

Neuk Vladimir Poetin.

Neuk de aanklagers.

Neuk de vervolgers.

Neuk de kerk.

Neuk patriarchaat.


Bevrijd “Pussy Riot”!

Nu de protesten nu pas beginnen …

Categories: Foreign Language (Translations), Nederlands (Dutch), Patriarchy, Politics and Current Events, Radical Feminism, Religion and Spirituality, Silencing Women | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Pussy Riot vil blive fængslet i to år

(bruger Google Oversæt # da / AF /)


Dette er uacceptabelt.

Fuck russiske regering.

Rend Vladimir Putin.

Fuck anklagere.

Fuck forfølgere.

Fuck kirken.

Rend patriarkatet.


Befri “Pussy Riot”!

Nu protester er kun lige begyndt …

Categories: Dansk (Danish), Foreign Language (Translations), Patriarchy, Politics and Current Events, Radical Feminism, Religion and Spirituality, Silencing Women | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Pussy Riot Jailed for Two Years



This is unacceptable.

Fuck the Russian government.

Fuck Putin.

Fuck the prosecutors.

Fuck the persecutors.

Fuck the church.

Fuck patriarchy.


Free Pussy Riot!

Now the protests are only beginning…

Categories: Articles In English, Patriarchy, Politics and Current Events, Radical Feminism, Religion and Spirituality, Silencing Women | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Free Pussy Riot — Kill Patriarchy

Please visit this website after you read the article.

Pussy Riot is a musical group of several women who are feminists.  They are against oppression and injustice.  When they performed a protest prayer inside a cathedral, they were arrested and taken to jail.  They have been locked in jail for months, and haven’t seen their children. They may be sent to prison for seven years……for offending religious people and a politician.

The trial of Pussy Riot is reminiscent of the witch trials in medieval Europe.  Women who are speaking out against the abuse of humanity are being called “obnoxious” and “offensive” and “dangerous”.  They are being tortured by being denied food and water and sleep.  Their trial is like a medieval inquisition.  Neo-Nazis are even accusing Pussy Riot of being Jewish infiltrators!  (  use  )

They have been in jail since March.  They are being kept in a cage, like animals.  They have not seen their children since their arrest.  This is ridiculous.  That means they were away from their children for 5 months.  That is unacceptable.  These women are political prisoners.  They did not hit anybody.  They did not destroy property or artwork in the church.  They did not commit slander (Putin actually IS bad!)  They did not defraud anyone of their money.  So why are they being held?  Why it is necessary to keep them as political prisoners?

The answer: they challenged patriarchy.  Their songs are a challenge against patriarchy.  Their name is a challenge against patriarchy.  What was their crime?  Offending Vladimir Putin, who is a male.  Even if Pussy Riot did not mention feminism specifically, they challenged what males love the most: authority and control.  Though their own husbands seem to be supportive and loving, most men in Russia and in the world are horrible and their patriarchy needs to be erased.   Even though the judge is a woman, it is still the system of patriarchy that is oppressing Pussy Riot.  The woman judge is a tool and the patriarchy is using her against other women.  Patriarchy hires women to help oppress other women so that it can blame women for their own oppression.

Putin is trying to stay in power until 2024.  He is obviously scared about what happened to the dictators Egypt and Libya.  He does not want to be removed.

Where was the jail term for the Pope when he said women should not be priests?  He offended women, so where are the police who must arrest him?  Are the religious people’s “hurt feelings” causing as much pain as being a woman who is sent to jail?  Is having your religious feelings hurt as painful as being forced to give birth after you are raped?  Is it as painful as being told you are sinful and evil?

We all know Vladimir Putin is a moron and a former KGB agent who would rather see Russia be Communist again, rather than a free country.  He is popular among neo-Nazis I have met.  He believes punishment and authoritarianism are the ways to solve problems.  Aren’t most men similar, especially Caucasian men?  This is why radical feminism is part of the solution.  It recognizes and attacks bad masculine behavior.

Alexei Nikiforov, the federal cock-sucker (I meant to say “prosecutor”!), says Pussy Riot deserves to go to jail because they “abused God.”  Did he forget about how people who are not rich are being abused?  Did he forget about how women are being abused?  Children?  People who are homosexual?  People who oppose war?  Children who are being sexually abused by priests?  Perhaps he has amnesia and should not be allowed to continue working at his job.

How can they arrest someone for “being decadent”?  People must be arrested for being decadent?  This means all the political officials (mostly males) should be in maximum security prisons for 500 years each!!

A seven year jail term is ridiculous. Many people in the United States who rob or attack people do not have to spend seven years in jail. Yet these women are being arrested because they oppose a politician.  (We now know who we must NOT vote for in the next election!)

We all know this: Pussy Riot would have never been punished so harshly if they were all men.
Police, we spit on you!  Putin, we spit on you! Catholic and Orthodox Churches, and all male-dominated religions, we spit on you, too!  Patriarchy, we spit on you most of all!

A verdict will take place on Friday.  We must do more than pray and hope for the women’s release.  We need to fight for change in our world.  If we can, we must protest outside the courthouse where the women are being tried for a “crime” they did not commit.  Big things have small beginnings.  Perhaps we can use this tragedy to start a worldwide revolution of women.  We will overthrow patriarchy in every country, and we will dismantle every religion and culture that pushes women down!

Free Pussy Riot!

Categories: Articles In English, Patriarchy, Politics and Current Events, Pragmatic Activism, Radical Feminism, Religion and Spirituality, Silencing Women | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Why liberal and anarchist men are misogynists

It’s been bugging me lately, the question: why are liberal and anarchist groups so anti-woman?  So misogynist.  So rape culture oriented.  At first I though this was just a stereotype, or a fad among the participants, like how teenagers tend to use cell phones more often that adults.  Then I decided I’d better take a closer look.


Boys don’t like authority.  It stifles them, locks them in, controls their behavior, and (ostensibly) protects the weak. Authority reminds them of their first female rulers, their mothers, who kept them on an umbilical leash, then on an emotional one, and likely whacked them when they picked on the girls.  They associate any and all authority with the Feminine, especially since the recent push for big government has included female politicians and feminists.  Even in popular films like Psycho, the female, particularly the mother, the primal authority figure, is the real villain.


Patriarchal media likes to pretend women control and influence their men, but if this were as common as they say, would there be any marital rape or pay inequality?  No.  Besides, this “power” they say women have usually consists of sexual “power”= ability to “seduce”.

All too many of these perverts are liberal, even though a good number are conservative.  A proportionately large number are socialists, democrats, or anarchists, whom you would expect to be more respectful of women.  Nevertheless…Anthony Weiner, who sexted- sent sexual cell phone text messages to- female citizens, is a Democrat.  Dominique Strauss Kahn was a French liberal, and he raped a maid.


Is this a surprise for a liberal man to be this way?  No.  When they scream about “freedom”, they mean freedom for them, not for you.  Men want the freedom to take away your freedom through coerced sex, usually PIV.  They claim you’re not really forced to, it’s just a social expectation. Of course, this is five sentences after complaining that social distaste for porn is a fascist infringement on their freedom of speech.


Boo hoo hoo!  Heaven forbid an authority figure tell me I can’t rape whoever I want!


Politically inclined men are always screaming about “dimmm-moccckk-rraaa-cceeeeeee!!!!” against the tyranny of monarchs- singular, often female authority figures who try to keep “the people”- read: men- from misbehaving.  In fact, one could read the anti-monarchist French Revolution as a giant 1960s, a giganto rebellion against the warm, sticky, “irrational”, idea of monarchy- it’s too family like, really.  Too familiar and warm and unmechanized. It’s not pathologically rational.


For example, the French Revolution was a dood-fit thrown against limits- especially economic ones- imposed by parent figures- often females like Marie Antoinette, who was not the peasant-hater she’s accused of being.

The obsession with “logic” and “objectivity” reminds us of Objectivism, a very pro-capitalist, anti-monarchy, anti-community philosophy- a very MALE philosophy which, surprisingly, was invented by a woman, Ayn Rand.


Now I hate to sound “fascist” here, but sometimes if the majority of a country’s populace misbehaves, then democracies or republics just aren’t desirable.  Like someone once said- I think it was Mark Twain maybe, I don’t know- “Every nation gets the government it deserves.” 

If you misbehave, you bring dictatorship on yourself, because, to the rest of the population, to the minority, you are so odious AND so numerous that freedom would only work in your benefit.  It often becomes necessary for that society to choose a queen or dictator and hope his or her ethics are good and that she is strong enough to change or contain the bad behavior and the misbehavers.  Besides, the men “ask for it”: every time a revolution’s over, they scream “the king is dead! long live the king!”



Here’s a reason “masculine” men might like socialism: THEY see it as a system that rewards the undeserving, like their anti­-socialist parents may have told them…only the boys like that supposed aspect of it.  Many women are conservative and capitalist, FAR more than you would expect to see, given the anti-woman stance of many parts of the Republican party.  Perhaps many of these women support capitalism because they see it as a was to reward the responsible, the good, the mature…and weed out losers and deadbeats.  Unfortunately, like most other systems, capitalism doesn’t punish men for their crimes, but allows them to go Scot-free.

Masculine men only like which political system suits them.   It’s just like with parents- they like Daddy when Daddy’s on their side, and the hate him when he defends little sister when they try to hit her.


I don’t feel the same way about the “democracy is the best system” idea the way most OccuProtesters do.  It was invented by males, inherent to the system of the state, born from bad monarchies and dictatorships, and a system of distribution and organization of goods- it still saw women and animals and children as goods and not as persons.  It’s a big farce designed to make us FEEL more free.  Perhaps democracy in itself isn’t bad, since it’s hard to tell what’s good or not when patriarchy is influencing everything.


The authorities males find acceptable are misogynistic- sort of like how these sorts of men only accept parents and teachers when they benefit the cause of the immature male.  They only accept authority when it’s pro-male.  Take the case of Europe, where men fight for the “freedom” of Muslims to impose Sharia law in their communities.  They’re fine with that.  But laws inEuropeabout verbally abusing your wife? Heaven forbid those stay on the books!  The EU, of course, is not popular with men, it being an all-encompassing entity designed to make European nations into more of a community.  Doesn’t help that it’s headed by many women, like Angela Merkel.  I’m not sure if the EU itself is a force for good, or for feminist good, but I know why men don’t like it- it’s too much like one big family for them, the good kind of family, not the kind of dysfunctional family that men see as analogous to the individual European governments- that is, families that have their sovereignty (read, their right to abuse their members) taken away by a big mommy figure.

The end of religion didn’t mean the end of male authority- it meant the end of the oppressive authority of sky gods and the beginning of the oppressive authority of real gods- men.  Atheists like Richard Dawkins are certainly no less authoritative or oppressive or masculinist and no less misogynist. (see his dismissal of Rebecca Watson’s ordeal) They don’t want less oppression- they want to take the emotion, the spirituality, the human side away from life and strip it naked- raw, hard, scientific, evolutionary male aggression and domination.

The women at Occupy Wall Street fear the Dionysian “freedom” element and prefer the Apollonian order and rationality.  Like conservative women, they instinctively understand that “freedom” and “anarchy” and “avante garde” mean freedom to rape, no government to punish rapists, and bizarre and painful sexual activities.


As you can imagine, many women support the state because it is defensive of them, but many others oppose it because it abuses them and they recognize it as an extension of patriarchy.  But a male anarchist state would still have patriarchy, and it would be uncontrolled, loose.  At least a state has objective rules it has to follow.

“Free speech” is a huge excuse for jerks and doods to unleash hate speech, violent porn, “art” featuring piss or pedophilia (or a combination of those two), and to delude or confuse victims into having very low self worth.

Anarchism, to men, is the freedom to have sex with 13 year olds without complaints from prudish conservative women.

Men’s idea of sex is active, so they’re the only ones who lose out when control is introduced, the way the bully or roughhouser loses out on the playground when the teacher says no hitting allowed.



The Occupy Movement quiets rape victims to protect the movement.  They keep the mic all to themselves.  They are obnoxious and loud; some expose themselves to child protestors.  Occupy dudes find feminism divisive, but not misogyny.  They only call the cops when a rapist gives the movement a bad name.  Somehow, surprisingly, when cops get involved, women still end up getting groped.  One newspaper warned men not to go to OWS in case they get arrested and raped in prison.  “It would be humiliating for her and especially for him…” the paper says.  That’s disgusting.


Men are having a hissy fit because they’re being marginalized by society- treated like girls.   They shriek about the spirit of humanity and how those awful one percenters are oppressing the other white male 14-16%!

The guy who made the video “Hot Chicks of Occupy Wall St.” makes rape jokes on his page on FaceBook.  What kind of “humane” world is this?





Another sexuality and politics theory:


Conservatives only allow men to have sex with one woman, so liberal men, in order to trick women into having sex with them, bash the conservatives.  Really, it’s not about the rights of women for either of them.  They both see her as property, only, true to form, the conservative is a robber baron and wants the property in the hands of one person, and the liberal is a damn commie who wants her to belong to everyone (hence the “sexual liberation” excitement).

This is why lots of self-assured men are often conservative- they don’t need the “help” of a fuck-buddy distribution system that the geeky communistic liberals want (seriously now- how many ACTUAL real life geeks are the sexually innocent respectful pals portrayed in movies?)

Oftentimes, the opposite of this whole theory is true.  Many wimpy men are conservative, possibly because they feel like they need a system to keep their “property” from running away.   Either way, they’re masculine men, and masculinity is NOT the healthy natural state of any human being.

Categories: Articles In English, Conservatism/Liberalism, Liberty Doods, Politics and Current Events, Radical Feminism, Sex | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 7 Comments

Blog at